Statistical Analysis

Amazon Filed the 'Amazon Leo' Trademark the Day It Killed 'Project Kuiper'

When Amazon retired the Project Kuiper code name and rechristened its satellite-internet constellation Amazon Leo on November 12, it did something the press release didn't mention: the next day, it

By Howard Katzenberg
June 4, 2026
18 min read

Founder, GleanMark

When Amazon retired the Project Kuiper code name and rechristened its satellite-internet constellation Amazon Leo on November 12, it did something the press release didn't mention: the next day, it went to the trademark office. AMAZON LEO (99494666) was filed November 13 — the rebrand and the filing are effectively the same event. Then, twelve days later, Amazon filed a bare LEO (99516140) on its own. The register caught the company building out a naming lane in real time.

That is the kind of thing the trademark register is unusually good at showing, and November 2025 had more of it than most months. Total USPTO applications came in at 49,015 — down 7.5% from October, but the third-strongest November in a decade and up 2.6% from last November. The dip is noise. The composition is the story.

"The register is where corporate branding decisions become public before the marketing department is ready for you to notice. Amazon told the world its satellites had a new name and filed the paperwork the very next morning."

— Howard Katzenberg, Founder, GleanMark

What We Found

  • Amazon's LEO filings track a live rebrand. AMAZON LEO was filed November 13, one day after the Project Kuiper → Amazon Leo announcement; a standalone LEO followed November 25.
  • November punched above its weight. At 49,015 applications, it was the third-highest November in the 2016–2025 series, behind only 2020 and 2021.
  • 2025 is outpacing 2024. Year-to-date filings reached 571,044 through November, up 5.0% and second only to 2021 among the years shown.
  • Software-services led on growth. Class 42 filings rose 32.9% year over year — the steepest YoY move in the top five.
  • McDonald's was the month's most active TTAB plaintiff, with 9 proceedings — consistent with its long-running, prefix-driven enforcement of the "Mc" family of marks.

Filing Volume

Monthly filing volume

MonthTotal FilingsMoM Change
November 202549,015-7.5%
October 202552,991-5.4%
September 202556,0264.3%
August 202553,722-2.1%
July 202554,8508.7%
June 202550,4474.1%
May 202548,440-8.2%
April 202552,785-0.3%
March 202552,96938.1%
February 202538,348-37.6%
January 202561,45114.9%
December 202453,45911.9%
November 202447,795

Yes, November fell 7.5% from October. A weak month does not finish third in a decade. Against its own history the month was strong: 49,015 applications trail only 2020's 58,910 and 2021's 49,398, and sit above every other November back to 2016.

The annual view is cleaner than the monthly one. Through November, 2025 reached 571,044 filings — up 5.0% from 543,902 in 2024, and the second-highest year-to-date total in the five years shown, behind 2021's post-pandemic spike. November itself rose 2.6% year over year.

November filings by year

Every November, 2016–2025

YearNovember Filings
201631,480
201737,489
201836,491
201935,368
202058,910
202149,398
202243,519
202345,415
202447,795
202549,015

November 2025 ranks third among the Novembers shown, behind 2020 and 2021.

NICE Class Leaderboard

RankNICE ClassDescriptionFilingsMoMYoY
19Electrical and scientific apparatus6,644-6.4%11.6%
241Education and entertainment services6,466-9.6%27.3%
335Advertising and business services5,642-14%7.8%
442Scientific and technological services; software design5,059-12.9%32.9%
525Clothing, footwear, and headwear5,033-10%0.7%
63Cosmetics and cleaning preparations2,728-0.6%8.3%
75Pharmaceuticals and medical preparations2,568-16.2%8.2%
828Toys, games, and sporting goods2,235-9.3%-10%
916Paper goods and printed matter2,186-6.3%10.9%
1021Housewares and glassware2,1601.8%-11.8%
1136Insurance and financial services1,968-16.4%7.6%
1244Medical, beauty, and agricultural services1,679-11.5%8.7%
1320Furniture and related goods1,6208%-16.2%
1430Staple foods1,499-11.5%6.3%
1511Environmental control apparatus1,40310.8%-16.5%

Class 9 and Class 41 still top the table by raw volume. But the number that should hold a practitioner's attention is Class 42, up 32.9% year over year — nearly triple Class 9's growth rate and the fastest mover in the top tier. Education and entertainment (Class 41, +27.3%) is the other standout.

We think the Class 42 surge most likely reflects the trademark mechanics of the AI build-out: companies naming models, developer tools, data products, and cloud platforms, often before those names surface through ordinary launch channels. That is a hypothesis, not a proven cause — but the concentration of growth in software-services rather than across the board is what you'd expect if it were true.

The soft spots are physical goods. Class 11, Class 20, Class 21, and Class 28 all fell year over year, even where they ticked up from October.

Top Filing Owners

OwnerFilingsPrior MonthMoM
GANNETT VENTURES, LLC500
WALMART APOLLO, LLC483060%
Yuexiang Zeng450
Zhiqu Li420
FARM JOURNAL, INC.330
VWWHP, LLC310
Rise to Nutrition, LLC291681.3%
JYP ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION288250%
L'OREAL (SOCIETE ANONYME)271580%
Chelsea Corporate Events LLC250
Abundantia Media LLC240
DANA HERITAGE FINANZ ST. HONORE BEAUTY LLC230

The named corporates are the useful read. JYP Entertainment's jump from 8 to 28 filings is the one to watch — a 250% month-over-month spike that, for a K-pop label, usually signals a cluster of artist, tour, merchandise, or platform brands going onto the register at once. Walmart Apollo (+60%) and L'Oréal (+80%) also stepped up their pace.

Most of the rest is the batch-filing economy: single-month LLCs and individual applicants that appear from zero and will likely vanish again. It's real volume, but it reflects channel mechanics, not a strategic roadmap, so it tells you less.

Top Correspondent Firms

FirmFilingsPrior MonthMoM
Swyft Legal LLC1,1051,250-11.6%
LZ Legal Services, LLC646943-31.5%
Overseas Operation Services, Inc. DBA Flatfee Corp.62648828.3%
Alioth Law P.C.5685395.4%
All West Law Group, PLLC27324212.8%
Usa237245-3.3%
Sparring Legal LLP228258-11.6%
Grogan, Tuccillo & Vanderleedeen, LLP2102033.4%
LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C.193232-16.8%
BAYRAMOGLU LAW OFFICES LLC18415121.9%
Law On Call, LLC175213-17.8%
One Juris PC1598391.6%

High-volume filing shops still own the top of this table. Swyft Legal led at 1,105 even after an 11.6% drop, and LZ Legal Services fell harder, down 31.5% to 646. The countertrend belongs to Flatfee Corp. (+28.3%), Bayramoglu (+21.9%), and One Juris, which nearly doubled from 83 to 159. Grogan, Tuccillo & Vanderleedeen is the rare traditional-firm name in a list otherwise built on volume intake.

Notable Filings

A theme runs through the month's corporate filings: companies registering the house mark and the short form of the same brand, days apart.

Amazon: AMAZON LEO, LEO, AMAZON CONNECT, AWS EDUCATE

MarkSerial NumberFiling DateStatus
AMAZON LEO99494666November 13, 2025Pending
AWS EDUCATE99510748November 21, 2025Pending
LEO99516140November 25, 2025Pending
AMAZON CONNECT99517611November 26, 2025Pending

The LEO pair is the cleanest case of the month. Amazon announced the Project Kuiper rebrand to Amazon Leo on November 12; AMAZON LEO was filed November 13, and the unadorned LEO followed on November 25. The name is a nod to the low-Earth-orbit constellation, and the two-filing sequence — branded mark first, short form after — is exactly the protective pattern you'd expect around a freshly named flagship. AMAZON CONNECT and AWS EDUCATE are existing Amazon cloud and education brands; their filings read as routine portfolio maintenance, not new product signals.

Google: GOOGLE TPU and IRONWOOD

MarkSerial NumberFiling DateStatus
GOOGLE TPU99509904November 21, 2025Pending
IRONWOOD99509911November 21, 2025Pending

This pair is a registration catch-up, not a leak. Ironwood is Google's seventh-generation Tensor Processing Unit, unveiled at Cloud Next in April 2025 and moved to general availability in November — so the November 21 filings landed alongside the chip's commercial launch, not ahead of it. Useful as confirmation that Google is locking down the Ironwood and TPU word marks now that the product is selling externally; not a preview of anything unannounced.

Samsung: BESPOKE AI LAUNDRY DUO, AI FOOD MANAGER, and more

MarkSerial NumberFiling DateStatus
MUSIC STUDIO99500743November 17, 2025Pending
SHEALTH RESEARCH99500585November 17, 2025Pending
MUSIC DISC99500747November 17, 2025Pending
AI FOOD MANAGER99514054November 24, 2025Pending
BESPOKE AI LAUNDRY DUO99517975November 26, 2025Pending

Samsung's filings map its AI-appliance strategy almost literally — laundry, food, health, audio. BESPOKE AI LAUNDRY DUO sits squarely within the Bespoke AI appliance line Samsung has been expanding (a related 2026 Bespoke AI Laundry Combo was unveiled at CES); the "Duo" filing suggests a distinct SKU or variant within that family rather than a wholly new brand. AI FOOD MANAGER points at connected-kitchen software. SHEALTH RESEARCH, filed by Samsung Research America, sits closest to the Samsung Health data and research stack.

Apple: PREVIEW 10X

MarkSerial NumberFiling DateStatus
PREVIEW 10X99510270November 21, 2025Pending

"Preview" is established Apple software vocabulary, and "10X" reads as a version or performance descriptor rather than a house mark. We could not match PREVIEW 10X to any publicly announced Apple product as of filing; on the name alone it looks like feature- or software-experience branding. Worth tracking as the goods-and-services description and any subsequent filings clarify intent.

Nike: NIKE MIND

MarkSerial NumberFiling DateStatus
NIKE MIND99505727November 19, 2025Pending

NIKE MIND points at the non-footwear edge of sports branding — training, mental performance, coaching, and digital wellness. We did not find a publicly announced product under this name at filing; the phrase is broad enough to stretch across apps, content, and athlete-development programs.

TTAB Activity

TypeFilingsPrior MonthMoM
Oppositions604734-17.7%
Cancellations224274-18.2%
PlaintiffProceedings Filed
MCDONALDS CORPORATION9
AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES, INC.6
FUENTE MARKETING, LTD.6
Jellycat, Ltd.5
CHANEL, INC.5
LFP IP, LLC4
APPLE, INC.4
HUGO BOSS TRADE MARK MANAGEMENT GMBH & CO. KG4
HUGO BOSS AG4

TTAB volume cooled across the board — oppositions down 17.7%, cancellations down 18.2%. The plaintiff list is the more interesting read. McDonald's topped it with 9 proceedings, which fits its well-documented habit of policing the "Mc" prefix aggressively across categories, including against marks with no food connection. Chanel and the two Hugo Boss entities reflect fashion's standing fight against look-alikes, and Jellycat's filings point to imitation pressure in the fast-scaling plush-and-collectibles market.

Registration Rates

Cohort MonthTotal FiledRegisteredRegistration Rate
November 202447,79522,89547.9%
October 202452,96726,16749.4%
September 202451,30823,18445.2%
August 202450,41116,21932.2%
July 202450,71518,53436.5%
June 202446,73218,82540.3%
May 202451,57025,54449.5%
April 202451,60925,43049.3%
March 202448,99325,01851.1%
February 202443,78821,61049.4%
January 202448,01425,92154%
December 202344,94924,74355%

Mature cohorts cluster in the high-40s to mid-50s, with July and August 2024 lagging at this snapshot as those filings continue to clear prosecution. Read this as cohort-maturity context, not a verdict on November 2025's filings, which are still almost entirely pending.

Practitioner Takeaways

  1. Class 42 is the month's real signal. Total volume was only modestly higher year over year; software-service filings rose 32.9%. That's where the energy is.
  2. Don't over-read the October-to-November dip. It was still the third-strongest November in a decade.
  3. Watch house-mark-plus-short-form pairs. Amazon's AMAZON LEO and LEO, filed twelve days apart around the Kuiper rebrand, show how large companies reserve both the branded and bare versions of a name.
  4. TTAB is quieter, but enforcement is still brand-driven. McDonald's, Amazon, Chanel, Apple, Hugo Boss, and Jellycat dominated the challenger list.

† "Usa" reflects a malformed correspondent-name record in the source data, not a law firm called Usa; figures are reported as recorded pending cleanup. ‡ Jellycat appears in the source data under two near-identical owner records ("Jellycat, Ltd." and "Jellycat Limited"), each credited with 5 proceedings; they map to the same entity, so the combined total may be as high as 10. Treat the count as approximate pending de-duplication.

Methodology: figures cover USPTO trademark applications by filing date, from GleanMark's mirror of the full USPTO dataset (~14M records). NICE class figures are class counts, not application counts — a single application can span multiple classes — so class growth and total-application growth are not directly comparable. Recent-month filings are ~99% pending, reflecting prosecution timing rather than outcomes; registration rates use cohorts old enough to have matured. Firm totals cover filings mapped to a correspondent (~70% of the month). Informational, not legal advice.

Explore more USPTO data analysis on the GleanMark Insights blog.

More in this series

Previous: October 2025 · Next: December 2025 · Browse all filing reports

Share this article

Put This Research Into Practice

Search 14M USPTO trademarks — no account required.