Draft OA responses in minutes.
Not hours.
Enter the serial number. GleanMark analyzes the Office Action, researches every cited mark, finds third-party coexistence evidence, and builds a ranked argument strategy — all in about 5 minutes. You review, customize, and file.
7-day Professional trial, no credit card required.
OA Response Draft
S/N 97-XXXXXX · 2(d) Likelihood of Confusion
The applied-for mark creates a distinct commercial impression due to differences in meaning, connotation, and overall appearance when compared to the cited registration.
The goods/services identified in the application target a fundamentally different trade channel and consumer base than those of the cited registration.
Coexisting registrations found
Active marks sharing the dominant element across related classes
4-6 hrs
Saved per OA response
Multiple
Refusal types covered
~5 min
To generate first draft
14M
USPTO records searched
How it works
From Office Action to structured draft in four steps.
Identify the refusal grounds and cited marks
Enter the serial number. GleanMark parses the Office Action, identifies every cited mark, and maps the examiner's refusal grounds automatically.
Find winning arguments from similar cases
We analyze successful OA responses that overcame the same examiner concerns — same refusal type, similar goods, comparable marks. The strategy is built on what actually worked, not templates.
Build a structured first draft
The draft includes a ranked argument strategy, cited mark research, third-party coexistence evidence, and source links to every assertion. [VERIFY] markers flag where you need to confirm facts or add client-specific detail.
Review, customize, and file
Every claim is substantiated with evidence. Every judgment call is clearly marked. You review the strategy, add your expertise, and file — in under an hour instead of a full day.
What every draft includes
Ranked argument strategies
Multiple approaches ranked by strength, with precedent support for each.
Cited mark research
Deep analysis of every mark cited by the examiner — goods overlap, ownership, prosecution history.
Third-party coexistence
Automatically finds co-existing registrations that weaken the examiner's 2(d) refusal.
[VERIFY] markers
Every section requiring your legal judgment is clearly tagged. AI handles research, you handle strategy.
Ready-to-edit format
Structured sections match standard OA response format. Copy into your template and customize.
~5 minute generation
From serial number to complete draft. Review and customize in under an hour.
See what a draft looks like
Every draft includes ranked strategies, evidence, and clear markers where your judgment is needed. The sample below was generated from a real USPTO Office Action — same format, same depth, same [VERIFY] markers you'd get for your own cases.
T TRINITY
§2(d) likelihood of confusion · class 035
Refused over the registered mark TRNITY, GleanMark drafts the full §2(d) response — argue the marks differ in their entireties, then show the cited mark is entitled to only a narrow scope, backed by a searched exhibit of 25 third-party TRINITY-formative registrations and register-coexistence evidence, with the USPTO record printouts attached.
A ranked argument strategy plus a near-filing-ready draft, grounded in real USPTO records — with an honest "verify before filing" checklist built in. A starting point for attorney review, not a substitute for it.
Download the full draft (PDF)Samples generated from real USPTO Office Actions using GleanMark's AI drafting pipeline. All data is public record.
Frequently asked questions
How long does it take to generate an OA response draft?
About 5 minutes from serial number to complete first draft. The system analyzes the Office Action, researches cited marks, finds third-party coexistence evidence, and builds a structured argument strategy. Most attorneys finish reviewing and customizing the draft in under an hour.
Does the AI draft replace my legal judgment?
No. Every section that requires attorney judgment is marked with [VERIFY] tags. The AI handles research — finding cited marks, coexistence evidence, and winning argument patterns from similar cases. You handle strategy and client-specific decisions.
What types of Office Actions does it handle?
Covers the most common substantive refusals — Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion, Section 2(e) descriptiveness, and specimen and disclaimer requirements. The system draws winning argument strategies from similar past Office Action responses.
How is this different from using ChatGPT for OA research?
ChatGPT does not have access to real-time USPTO data. GleanMark searches 14M actual trademark records, analyzes real prosecution histories, and finds verified third-party coexistence evidence. Every assertion is sourced and linked back to the underlying record.
What does OA drafting cost?
Starter plans include 1 OA draft per month. Professional plans include 3 drafts per seat per month (additional drafts available at $49 each). Max plans include unlimited OA drafting.
Related on GleanMark
Stop starting OA responses from scratch.
Your next Office Action response can take an hour instead of a full day. 7-day Professional trial — no credit card required.
Start Free Trial