Enter the serial number. GleanMark analyzes the Office Action, researches every cited mark, finds third-party coexistence evidence, and builds a ranked argument strategy — all in about 5 minutes. You review, customize, and file.
14-day free trial. No credit card required.
S/N 97-XXXXXX · 2(d) Likelihood of Confusion
The applied-for mark creates a distinct commercial impression due to differences in meaning, connotation, and overall appearance when compared to the cited registration.
The goods/services identified in the application target a fundamentally different trade channel and consumer base than those of the cited registration.
Coexisting registrations found
Active marks sharing the dominant element across related classes
4-6 hrs
Saved per OA response
240M+
Prosecution events analyzed
~5 min
To generate first draft
13.9M
USPTO records searched
From Office Action to structured draft in four steps.
Enter the serial number. GleanMark parses the Office Action, identifies every cited mark, and maps the examiner's refusal grounds automatically.
We analyze successful OA responses that overcame the same examiner concerns — same refusal type, similar goods, comparable marks. The strategy is built on what actually worked, not templates.
The draft includes a ranked argument strategy, cited mark research, third-party coexistence evidence, and source links to every assertion. [VERIFY] markers flag where you need to confirm facts or add client-specific detail.
Every claim is substantiated with evidence. Every judgment call is clearly marked. You review the strategy, add your expertise, and file — in under an hour instead of a full day.
Multiple approaches ranked by strength, with precedent support for each.
Deep analysis of every mark cited by the examiner — goods overlap, ownership, prosecution history.
Automatically finds co-existing registrations that weaken the examiner's 2(d) refusal.
Every section requiring your legal judgment is clearly tagged. AI handles research, you handle strategy.
Structured sections match standard OA response format. Copy into your template and customize.
From serial number to complete draft. Review and customize in under an hour.
Every draft includes ranked strategies, evidence, and clear markers where your judgment is needed. Download a real sample below.
S/N 97-XXXXXX · 2(d) Likelihood of Confusion
The applied-for mark creates a distinct commercial impression due to differences in meaning, connotation, and overall appearance when compared to the cited registration.
The goods/services identified in the application target a fundamentally different trade channel and consumer base than those of the cited registration.
Coexisting registrations found
Active marks sharing the dominant element across related classes
Generated from real USPTO Office Actions. Same format, same depth, same [VERIFY] markers you'd get for your own cases.
Single-word pharmaceutical mark — 2(d) likelihood of confusion. Shows ranked strategies, cited mark analysis, third-party coexistence evidence, and narrowing amendment language.
Descriptiveness refusal for a chemical compound name. Demonstrates genericness vs. descriptiveness analysis, Supplemental Register fallback strategy, and Section 2(f) acquired distinctiveness path.
Multi-issue Office Action: likelihood of confusion, specimen refusal, disclaimer requirement, and identification amendment. Shows how the system handles complex, compound refusals in a single structured draft.
Samples generated from real USPTO Office Actions using GleanMark's AI drafting pipeline. All data is public record.
About 5 minutes from serial number to complete first draft. The system analyzes the Office Action, researches cited marks, finds third-party coexistence evidence, and builds a structured argument strategy. Most attorneys finish reviewing and customizing the draft in under an hour.
No. Every section that requires attorney judgment is marked with [VERIFY] tags. The AI handles research — finding cited marks, coexistence evidence, and winning argument patterns from similar cases. You handle strategy and client-specific decisions.
Currently focused on Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion refusals, which account for the majority of substantive Office Actions. The system analyzes 240M+ prosecution events to find winning argument strategies from similar cases.
ChatGPT does not have access to real-time USPTO data. GleanMark searches 13.9M actual trademark records, analyzes real prosecution histories, and finds verified third-party coexistence evidence. Every assertion is sourced and linked — no hallucinations.
Starter plans include 1 OA draft per month. Professional plans include 3 drafts per seat per month (additional drafts available at $49 each). Firm plans include unlimited OA drafting.
Your next Office Action response can take an hour instead of a full day. 14-day free trial — no credit card required.
Start Free TrialWe use cookies (including Google Analytics) to improve our site and understand how visitors use it.