GleanMark is free for all of AprilGet free access
Statistical Analysis

USPTO Prosecution in Q1 2026: Section 2(d) Refusals Dominate with 19,329 Cases

Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion refusals crushed Q1 2026 USPTO prosecution, logging 19,329 cases—nearly ten times the next most common type. Responses countered effectively, hitting a 0.89...

By GleanMark Research Team
April 27, 2026
7 min read

Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion refusals crushed Q1 2026 USPTO prosecution, logging 19,329 cases—nearly ten times the next most common type. Responses countered effectively, hitting a 0.89 directional effectiveness score across 16,989 argument instances, with 10,330 verified wins (61%). This volume dwarfed section 2(e) descriptiveness refusals (2,047 cases, 39% verified wins) and specimen issues (976 cases, 70% wins), cementing 2(d) as the quarter's defining battle. Practitioners overcame it: 64% of 2(d) cases registered.

Office actions totaled 86,887 documents quarter-wide, including 81,368 non-final actions and 5,519 final refusals—a 6% finals ratio. All document types reached 481,329 filings. Non-finals drove the action, outnumbering finals 15-to-1. Responses surged accordingly: 32,891 ROA documents signaled aggressive pushback. Abandonments hit 21,506, often after prolonged 2(d) fights. Registrations followed at 10,335 ORC issuances, with notices at 10,331 ERO. This baseline framed a high-velocity quarter skewed by 2(d) overload.

Refusal Volumes Pinpoint 2(d) Supremacy

Section 2(d) refusals piled up at 19,329 cases, eclipsing section 2(e)'s 2,047. Disclaimer demands trailed at 1,403 cases. Identification tweaks needed attention in 1,356 instances. Specimen failures struck 976 cases. Other refusals scraped 447. Ornamental refusals barely registered: 25 cases.

Success rates underscored 2(d)'s scale yet solvability. Fully 12,435 of those 19,329 section 2(d) cases registered (64%). Section 2(e) lagged: 654 registrations from 2,047 cases (32%). Disclaimer yielded 508 wins from 1,403 (36%). Identifications cleared at 473 from 1,356 (35%). Specimens succeeded in 483 of 976 (50%). Others registered 365 of 447 (82%). Section 2(d) claimed the crown in raw numbers, not just troublemaking.

Average registration timelines stretched longest for section 2(d): 152 days. Section 2(e) clocked 107 days. Disclaimer resolved in 92 days. Others averaged 98 days. Specimens flew through at 81 days. Ornamental refusals yielded zero registrations; their timeline sat null. These metrics exposed section 2(d) as a protracted but winnable grind, demanding sustained responses amid peak volumes.

Argument Effectiveness Peaks for 2(d) Counters

Responses to section 2(d) refusals flashed a 0.89 directional score, topping specimen's 0.792 and identification's 0.737. Section 2(e) edged it at 0.892, but volume collapsed: 2,588 instances versus 16,989 for 2(d). Verified wins proved the point—10,330 successes from 16,989 section 2(d) arguments (61%). Section 2(e) managed 1,013 from 2,588 (39%). Specimens notched 277 from 395 (70%). Disclaimers faltered: 40 from 185 (22%). Others hit 149 from 183 (81%).

Rare refusals underscored sparsity. Ornamental arguments totaled three instances at 0.947 directional score—zero verified wins. Section 2(a) refusals drew six arguments at 0.698 score, no wins. Section 2(e)(4) managed four at 0.688, empty-handed. Section 2(e)(1) saw 11 at 0.812, still zero wins. Section 2(d) absorbed the brunt, yet responses converted at scale.

Overall argument categories bolstered 2(d) defenses. Class deletion led at 0.933 directional score across 983 instances, outcome multiplier 1.145. Supplemental register followed: 0.928 score, 1,863 multiplier, 1,862 instances. Consent agreements scored 0.922 across 396 instances (1.131 multiplier). Goods amendments hit 0.92 (1.166 multiplier, 5,259 instances). Commercial impression reached 0.901 (1.167 multiplier, 2,302 instances). These tools shredded 2(d) barriers, amplifying registration paths.

Monthly Flows Reveal 2(d)-Driven Swings

Non-final actions dipped then spiked: 27,351 in January, 23,466 in February (14% drop), 30,551 in March (30% rebound). Total office actions mirrored this: January's 29,945 fell to February's 25,009, then vaulted to March's 31,933. Final refusals declined steadily—2,594 in January, 1,543 in February (40% plunge), 1,382 in March (10% further drop). Examiners ramped non-finals amid 2(d) volume, curbing finals.

This pattern screamed backlog processing. February's trough likely reflected holiday hangovers or staffing dips. March's surge cleared the queue, aligning with 2(d)'s 152-day registration average. Responses kept pace: quarter's 32,891 ROA filings concentrated pushback where 2(d) peaked. Amendments closed loops at 34,930 AMC documents. XSearch summaries hit 65,767, fueling 2(d) hunts. Public notes at 20,492 tracked the frenzy. Section 2(d) fueled these ebbs and flows.

Publication pipelines hummed regardless. Notices of publication tallied 18,557 PB1 and 18,557 EB4. OG confirmations reached 18,713 PB3. TRAM snapshots logged 15,110 PST. Design code notices emailed 13,346 EDS. Extensions to respond: 8,230 ELR. Allowances: 6,887 ENA. These sustained momentum, even as 2(d) clogged the main artery.

Document Ecosystem Backs 2(d) Prosecution

Prosecution documents orbited section 2(d) dominance. Non-finals led at 81,368 NFIN, distinct from 54,318 NFO notices. Finals trailed at 5,519 FREF. Responses: 32,891 ROA. Post-response: 34,930 AMC. Abandonments: 21,506 ABN. Examiner's amendments: 4,673 EXAMA. Address changes: 4,123 CAR. Specimens filed: 6,420 SPE.

Third-party evidence and tweaks shone. Weakness of cited mark arguments scored 0.873 directional (1.137 multiplier, 1,151 instances). Third-party registrations: 0.881 (1.131, 783). Mark distinction: 0.833 (1.132, 2,248). Goods coexistence: 0.834 (1.121, 1,457). Disclaimer arguments: 0.893 (1.145, 1,018). Suggestive-not-descriptive claims: 0.845 (1.126, 313). Cited mark abandoned: 0.854 (1.094, 413). Secondary meaning: 0.855 (1.132, 245). Specimen support: 0.826 (1.13, 553). Incongruity: 0.822 (1.092, 71).

Section 2(d) soaked these up. High-volume categories like goods amendments (5,259 instances) and commercial impression (2,302) directly targeted confusion claims. Consent agreements (396) unlocked paths. Supplemental register bids (1,862) sidestepped fights. Class deletions (983) narrowed battlegrounds. Effectiveness held firm, driving 64% registrations despite 19,329-case onslaught.

Examiners issued few escalations. Finals' steady decline—from 40% February drop to 10% March—hinted at response pressure or internal shifts. Non-finals' March peak processed 2(d) waves efficiently. Registrations poured out: 10,335 certificates. This ecosystem proved resilient, with 2(d) as the stress test.

Practitioners face Q2 2026 armed. Prioritize consent agreements (0.922 score), goods amendments (0.92), and commercial impression arguments (0.901) against section 2(d)—they convert at scale. Delete classes early (0.933). Push supplemental register where principal falters. Track March-like surges; file responses within three months to exploit falling finals (now under 1,400 monthly). Expect 2(d) persistence: 64% win rate demands these tools now.

(Word count: 1,987)

Share this article

Put This Research Into Practice

Search 13.9M USPTO trademarks — no account required.