Trademarks 101

TEAS Plus vs Trademark Center: A Filing Comparison Guide

By GleanMark Team
February 4, 2026
5 min read

If you have been filing trademark applications for any length of time, you developed muscle memory around TEAS. You knew which form to pick, when to use the ID Manual, how to save .obj files for client review, and exactly what TEAS Plus required to earn that $250/class rate. On January 18, 2025, the USPTO retired TEAS Plus and TEAS Standard permanently and replaced them with Trademark Center. The TEAS Plus vs Trademark Center comparison is not just about a new interface -- it represents a philosophical shift in how the USPTO prices and processes trademark filings. This guide maps every TEAS workflow you relied on to its Trademark Center equivalent, so you can adapt without guesswork.

Why the USPTO Replaced TEAS

TEAS served as the sole online trademark filing platform for more than 20 years. It worked, but it showed its age. Draft applications had to be saved as local .obj files and emailed between attorneys and clients. There was no collaboration layer, no cloud saving, and no integrated docket management. The two-tier fee structure -- TEAS Plus at $250/class and TEAS Standard at $350/class -- attempted to incentivize complete filings, but the mechanism was blunt: choose the cheaper form and meet all 20 data requirements, or choose the more expensive form and skip some.

Trademark Center replaces all of that with a single platform built from scratch. The USPTO's stated goals were to simplify the filing experience, reduce incomplete applications, and create a unified hub that would eventually handle every trademark transaction -- not just initial applications, but maintenance filings, amendments, and correspondence.

For a deeper look at Trademark Center's new features and roadmap, see our Trademark Center Guide. The transition was not optional. As of January 18, 2025, TEAS is no longer available for new trademark applications. Certain post-registration forms remain accessible through legacy TEAS during the ongoing migration, but initial applications must go through Trademark Center.

The Core Conceptual Shift: Discounts vs. Surcharges

Before diving into feature comparisons, it is worth understanding the single most important change, because it affects every cost calculation going forward.

Under TEAS: The default filing cost was $350/class (TEAS Standard). Applicants who met all requirements -- ID Manual descriptions, all 20 data elements, email correspondence -- earned a discount to $250/class (TEAS Plus). The system rewarded completeness.

Under Trademark Center: The base filing cost is $350/class. There is no discount for completeness. Instead, the system charges surcharges for incompleteness. Custom goods/services descriptions, missing information, and verbose text each add fees on top of the base rate.

The financial incentive still points in the same direction: file complete, well-described applications. But the mechanism is inverted. Under TEAS, a well-prepared application cost less than the default. Under Trademark Center, a well-prepared application costs exactly the default, and anything less costs more.

For practitioners who consistently filed via TEAS Plus, this means a flat $100/class increase with no change in behavior. For those who relied on TEAS Standard's flexibility, the cost implications are steeper.

Side-by-Side: TEAS vs. Trademark Center Features

The table below maps every significant TEAS feature to its Trademark Center equivalent. If you are a paralegal or attorney looking for a quick-reference migration checklist, start here.

Workflow AreaTEAS (Retired)Trademark Center (Current)
Fee tiersTwo options: TEAS Plus ($250/class) or TEAS Standard ($350/class)Single tier: $350/class base + conditional surcharges
Fee incentive modelDiscount for meeting requirementsSurcharges for failing to meet requirements
Filing interfaceDense, form-based layout with all fields visibleWizard-style, step-by-step guided process
Goods/services descriptionsTEAS Plus required ID Manual; TEAS Standard allowed freeformID Manual recommended; freeform triggers $200/class surcharge
Draft savingLocal .obj files saved to your computerCloud-based, automatic saving within the platform
Client reviewEmail .obj files back and forthBuilt-in draft sharing with co-edit capability
Docket managementSeparate system (TSDR)Integrated docket view within Trademark Center
Status trackingCheck TSDR manuallyStatus visible directly in your Trademark Center account
Account securityBasic username/password loginTwo-factor authentication required
Trademark searchSeparate from filing (tmsearch.uspto.gov)Built-in search during the filing process
CorrespondenceTEAS Plus required email; Standard allowed paperAll correspondence is electronic by default
Feedback to USPTOEmail or phoneIn-app feedback button routed to the development team
Attorney changesStandard CAR form processUpdated CAR form: 48-hour client approval, single-submission revoke-and-appoint

Fee Comparison: What You Actually Pay

The table below compares costs across common filing scenarios. This is where the surcharge model becomes concrete.

Filing ScenarioOld TEAS CostTrademark Center CostDifference
Complete application, ID Manual descriptions$250/class (TEAS Plus)$350/class+$100/class
Complete application, custom descriptions$350/class (TEAS Standard)$550/class ($350 + $200 custom text surcharge)+$200/class
Incomplete application, ID Manual descriptions$250/class + risk of reclassification to Standard$450/class ($350 + $100 insufficient info surcharge)+$200/class
Incomplete application, custom descriptions, verbose text$350/class (TEAS Standard)$750+/class ($350 + $100 + $200 + $200 per additional 1K characters)+$400+/class

For a full breakdown of the 2025 fee restructuring, see our USPTO Fee Changes guide. Three details matter for budget planning:

  1. The $100 insufficient information surcharge is non-curable. Under TEAS Plus, you could fix deficiencies after filing (though you might be reclassified to Standard pricing). Under Trademark Center, the surcharge is assessed at submission and cannot be reversed, even if you provide the missing information later through a preliminary amendment.

  2. Surcharges stack. A single application can incur the $100 insufficient info surcharge, the $200 custom description surcharge, and one or more $200 excess character surcharges simultaneously. There is no cap.

  3. The 1,000-character threshold is per class. Each class of goods or services gets 1,000 characters for its description. Exceeding that limit triggers an additional $200 surcharge per 1,000-character increment. If you file three classes and two exceed the threshold, you pay the excess character surcharge twice.

Mapping Your TEAS Workflow to Trademark Center

If You Were a TEAS Plus Filer

You are the group least disrupted by this change. Your filing habits -- selecting ID Manual descriptions, providing all 20 data elements upfront, accepting email correspondence -- align perfectly with what Trademark Center considers a surcharge-free application.

What changes:

  • Your per-class cost increases from $250 to $350. This is unavoidable.
  • You no longer need to choose between form types. There is one form.
  • The filing interface is entirely different. Expect an adjustment period with the wizard-style layout.
  • Cloud draft saving replaces .obj files. You no longer need to manage local files.

What stays the same:

  • ID Manual usage remains the standard practice.
  • All 20 required data elements remain the same.
  • Electronic correspondence remains the default.

Net impact: Budget $100 more per class. If you file 200 applications per year averaging 1.5 classes each, that is roughly $30,000 in additional annual filing costs.

If You Were a TEAS Standard Filer

Your workflow required more adaptation. TEAS Standard's defining advantage -- the ability to use custom goods/services descriptions without penalty -- no longer exists.

What changes:

  • Custom descriptions now cost $200/class on top of the $350 base. A single-class filing with custom text costs $550, compared to $350 under TEAS Standard.
  • If your custom descriptions exceed 1,000 characters per class, each additional 1,000-character block adds another $200.
  • The $100 insufficient info surcharge applies if you omit any of the 20 required data elements, and it cannot be cured after filing.

What to do:

  • Audit your most common goods/services descriptions against the ID Manual. Many custom descriptions have equivalent or near-equivalent ID Manual entries. Switching to these eliminates the $200 surcharge entirely.
  • For descriptions that genuinely require custom text, keep them concise. Stay under 1,000 characters per class whenever possible.
  • Treat every required field as mandatory at filing time, because the cost of omission is now permanent.

If You Were Filing for Clients Who Reviewed Drafts

This is where Trademark Center genuinely improves the practitioner experience. Under TEAS, the draft review process looked like this:

  1. Prepare the application in TEAS.
  2. Save the draft as an .obj file.
  3. Email the .obj file to the client (or print a summary).
  4. Receive feedback via email or phone.
  5. Re-open the .obj file in TEAS and make changes.
  6. Repeat until approved.

Under Trademark Center:

  1. Prepare the application in Trademark Center.
  2. Share the draft through the platform's built-in sharing feature.
  3. Client reviews the draft in their browser -- no file downloads required.
  4. Make changes directly in the cloud-saved draft.
  5. Submit when approved.

The .obj file workflow was a persistent source of frustration. Files could become corrupted, clients struggled to open them, and version control was nonexistent. Trademark Center's cloud-based draft sharing eliminates all of these issues.

New Security and Access Controls

Trademark Center introduces account-level changes that affect how your firm operates on the platform.

Two-Factor Authentication

All USPTO.gov accounts now require two-factor authentication. If you have not set this up, do it before you need to file. The identity verification process takes time and is not something you want to troubleshoot on a filing deadline.

Role-Based Access

The USPTO introduced role-based access controls in 2025, allowing firms to manage which team members can file, view, or edit applications. This is a meaningful improvement for firms where paralegals prepare applications and attorneys review before submission.

The Updated CAR Form

The Change of Address or Representation (CAR) form was overhauled in July 2025. The new version allows a client to revoke an existing attorney and appoint a new one in a single submission. Previously, this required separate filings. The new attorney can initiate the form, and the trademark owner has 48 hours to approve or reject the change. If approved, the new representation takes effect immediately.

For practitioners managing attorney transitions, this cuts what used to be a multi-step process down to one form and a two-day approval window.

Common Mistakes During the Transition

After more than a year of Trademark Center being live, certain mistakes appear repeatedly among practitioners migrating from TEAS.

1. Assuming $350 Is Always the Total Cost

The base fee is $350/class, but surcharges can push the cost to $750 or more per class. Review every application for surcharge triggers before submission. Trademark Center displays a running cost total during the wizard -- use it.

2. Defaulting to Custom Descriptions Out of Habit

Many TEAS Standard filers wrote custom descriptions for every application because there was no price penalty. That habit now costs $200/class. Check the ID Manual first. The USPTO has expanded it significantly, and most standard goods and services have pre-approved descriptions available.

3. Missing Required Information at Filing

Under TEAS Plus, incomplete applications could be reclassified to Standard pricing -- a painful but recoverable situation. Under Trademark Center, the $100/class insufficient information surcharge is assessed at the moment of filing and cannot be reversed. There is no cure. Double-check every required field before submitting.

4. Exceeding the 1,000-Character Threshold

When custom descriptions are necessary, keep them tight. Each class has a 1,000-character allowance for freeform text. Going over triggers $200 surcharges in 1,000-character increments. One verbose class description on a three-class application can add $200-$600 to the total cost.

5. Not Setting Up Accounts in Advance

The two-factor authentication and identity verification process is not instant. Attorneys and paralegals who need to file should set up their USPTO.gov accounts well before any deadline. Waiting until filing day is a recipe for missed deadlines and unnecessary stress.

6. Saving Files Locally Out of Habit

If you find yourself looking for a "save to file" button, stop. Trademark Center saves drafts to the cloud automatically. There is no .obj file to download, and no reason to create one. Your draft is accessible from any browser where you can log into your USPTO.gov account.

What Is Still in Transition

Not everything has moved to Trademark Center yet. As of early 2026, certain post-registration forms -- including some maintenance filings (Sections 8, 9, and 71) -- are still being migrated from legacy TEAS. The USPTO has stated that Trademark Center will eventually handle all trademark transactions, but the timeline for full migration has not been finalized.

Before filing any post-registration document, check the current status at USPTO.gov to determine whether the form is available in Trademark Center or still requires legacy TEAS access.

The TEASi integration (for international applications under the Madrid Protocol) is also part of the planned migration but has not yet been completed.

Practical Checklist for Practitioners

Use this checklist to ensure a smooth transition from TEAS to Trademark Center:

  • Set up your USPTO.gov account with two-factor authentication and identity verification
  • Update your budget projections to reflect the $350/class base (up from $250 for former TEAS Plus filers)
  • Audit your standard goods/services descriptions against the ID Manual to identify custom text you can replace
  • Brief your clients on the new cost structure, especially if they historically approved custom descriptions without concern for cost
  • Train your team on the wizard-style interface and cloud draft sharing workflow
  • Update your internal checklists to treat all 20 data elements as strictly mandatory at filing (no more "we can fix it later")
  • Review the updated CAR form process if your firm handles attorney changes
  • Remove .obj file references from your internal procedures and templates

Monitoring Your Marks After Filing

Filing the application is just the first step. Once your trademark is registered, you need to monitor for potential infringements, conflicting filings, and status changes across the USPTO database. GleanMark provides automated trademark monitoring that tracks new filings, status changes, and potential conflicts -- giving attorneys and brand owners visibility without the manual TSDR checks that TEAS-era workflows required.

Whether you are transitioning from TEAS or building your trademark practice from scratch under the new system, the fundamentals have not changed: file complete applications, use ID Manual descriptions when possible, and keep your registrations monitored. The tools and costs have shifted. The discipline required has not.

Share this article

Put This Research Into Practice

Search 13.9M USPTO trademarks — no account required.

Cookie Preferences

We use cookies (including Google Analytics) to improve our site and understand how visitors use it.