Product Guide
Winning Arguments Database
By Howard Katzenberg
April 13, 2026
3 min read
The team behind GleanMark
The Winning Arguments database collects successful office action response strategies. Browse by refusal type, view effectiveness rankings, and find precedent you can cite in your own responses.
What You Can Do
- Browse featured winning cases
- View strategy effectiveness rankings by refusal type
- Search for arguments by category (Section 2(d), 2(e), etc.)
- Read detailed case breakdowns with the arguments that worked
- Apply strategies to your own office action responses
How It Works
- Navigate to Winning Arguments — go to
/resources/winning-arguments - Browse the dashboard — see hero stats, strategy effectiveness charts, and featured cases
- Filter by refusal type — Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion, Section 2(e) merely descriptive, and others
- Click a case to see the full breakdown — what was refused, what arguments were made, and what worked
- Apply to your cases — use the strategies and citations in your own OA responses
Dashboard
The Winning Arguments dashboard shows:
- Hero stats — total cases, win rates, top strategies
- Strategy effectiveness chart — which argument types have the highest success rates
- Featured winning cases — hand-picked examples of effective responses
- Refusal-type strategy grid — organized by Section 2(d), 2(e), and other refusal types
Browse & Search
The browse view (/resources/winning-arguments/browse) provides:
- Full-text search across all cases
- Filters for refusal type (Section 2(d), Section 2(e)), argument category, and Nice class group
- Sortable results (by effectiveness or timeline)
Tips
- Start with your refusal type — if you have a 2(d) refusal, filter to 2(d) strategies first
- Look at the effectiveness rankings — some argument types work more often than others
- Combine with the OA drafting tool — Winning Arguments provides the strategy, the drafter applies it to your specific case
- Check for similar fact patterns — a case with similar goods/services and mark similarity is more persuasive than a generic argument
Related Features
- AI Office Action Drafting — Generate a draft response using these strategies
- Markus AI — Ask "What are the best arguments against a 2(d) refusal?"
- Examiner Profiles — Research the examiner's refusal patterns
Related Articles
Statistical Analysis
The USPTO Issued More Trademark Office Actions in September 2025 Than in July and August Combined
June 4, 2026
Statistical Analysis
The USPTO Kept Examining Through the Longest Shutdown in History — and Q4's Numbers Show It
June 4, 2026
Statistical Analysis
Trademark Examiners Cleared a Backlog in March: Non-Final Actions Jumped 57% to End Q1 2026
June 4, 2026