AI Office Action Response Drafting
The team behind GleanMark
When you receive a USPTO office action, GleanMark's AI drafting tool researches the cited marks, analyzes the refusal type, finds relevant precedent, and generates an attorney-ready response draft. Review, edit, and share with clients.
What You Can Do
- Generate draft responses to Section 2(d) and other refusal types
- Get AI-researched arguments with precedent citations
- Review cited marks and their prosecution history
- Edit the draft before sharing
- Share a formatted draft with clients via a public link
- Access OA research and strategy tools
How It Works
The drafter (the "Office Action Response Drafter" page) works from a serial number — it auto-fetches the latest office action and prosecution history for you. There is no separate refusal-picker step.
- Open the drafter — navigate to
/draft-response - Enter a serial number — type or paste a USPTO serial number and let it validate, or pick a mark from one of your portfolios using the "From Portfolio" tab
- Click "Generate Strategic Draft" — the system fetches the current office action, builds a case packet from USPTO records and examiner evidence, plans a response strategy, and drafts, reviews, and finalizes the response
- Review the draft — read the generated arguments, check citations, and edit as needed
- Share with client — generate a shareable link for client review
Refusal Types Supported
- Section 2(d) — likelihood of confusion (the most common refusal)
- Subtypes: goods overlap, mark similarity, trade channel overlap, and more
- Merely descriptive (Section 2(e)(1))
- Geographic descriptiveness
- Surname refusal
- Specimen issues
- Identification of goods/services
- Disclaimer requirements
- And other common refusal types
OA Research Tools
Beyond drafting, the Office Action Research page (/oa-research) has three tabs:
- Search Cases — find office action cases by refusal type, examiner, outcome, and more
- Strategy Lab — analyze strategies that have worked for similar refusals
- Coexistence — research coexistence patterns between cited marks
Winning Arguments Database
At /resources/winning-arguments, browse a database of successful office action response strategies:
- Strategy effectiveness rankings
- Featured winning cases
- Refusal-type strategy grids (Section 2(d), 2(e), and more)
- Searchable case details
Tips
- Review the cited marks yourself — the AI draft is a starting point, not a final product
- Check the refusal subtype — a 2(d) refusal based on goods overlap needs different arguments than one based on mark similarity
- Use the Winning Arguments database to find strategies that have worked in similar situations
- Always review before sharing — the draft is attorney-ready but needs your professional judgment
What's Included in Each Plan
| Feature | Starter | Professional | Max |
|---|---|---|---|
| OA draft responses | 1/month included (per-draft pricing after) | 3/seat/month | Unlimited |
| OA research tools | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Winning arguments | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Current included allowances and per-draft pricing are shown on the Billing page and at checkout.
Related Features
- Markus AI — Ask Markus to research an office action
- Examiner Profiles — Research the examining attorney's patterns
- Confusion Analysis (DuPont) — Supporting analysis for 2(d) refusals
Related Articles
AI Office Action Response Drafting: From USPTO Refusal to Attorney-Ready Draft in Minutes
March 30, 2026
TTAB Q4 2025: Opposition Plaintiffs Won Roughly Five of Every Eight Decisions
June 4, 2026
Maradona's Heirs Win at the TTAB as Q1 Filings Slip 7.4%
June 4, 2026