Uber Technologies, Inc. (P) vs Innoroc GmbH (D)
Not Instituted
Extensions of Time to Oppose
Sign in to see Uber Technologies, Inc.’s full record as plaintiff — how many cases they have brought, how often the other side contests, and how many reach a decision on the merits.
Proceeding Details
Proceeding Number
Filing Date
Sep 24, 2026
Last Status Update
Sep 24, 2026
Interlocutory Attorney
Not Assigned
Parties
Plaintiff
Uber Technologies, Inc.
FENWICK & WEST LLP
801 CALIFORNIA STREET, SILICON VALLEY CENTER
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041
Attorney / Correspondent:
CONNIE L. ELLERBACHFENWICK & WEST LLP
801 CALIFORNIA STREET, SILICON VALLEY CENTER
MOUNTAIN VIEW, CA 94041
VS
Defendant
Innoroc GmbH
DRAGON SUN LAW FIRM, P.C.
148 EAST AVE, UNIT 1F
NORWALK, CT 06851
Attorney / Correspondent:
Mark:
UBERMILK PLUS
Pending
S/N: 79417435TTAB Documents
Who they are, and how they litigate
An extension of time asks for time — nothing has been pleaded yet. This is the record of the party who filed it.
Uber Technologies, Inc.
Sign in to see this party’s full TTAB record — how many cases they have brought and defended, how often the other side contests, and how many reach a decision on the merits rather than ending in a default or a withdrawal.