GM
GleanMark
GM
GleanMark
Free Search
Pricing
Security
Book a Demo
All InsightsTTAB Desk

GleanMark · From the record

TTAB Desk

The filings, the decisions and what happened before, reported from the Trademark Board's own records.

19 stories · Latest Oct 15, 2026

MEN WITH THE POT
MENWITHTHEPOT
v.

Challenged registration

Petitioner’s mark

Latest · Decision Desk

Zhang keeps MEN WITH THE POT registration because both cases rested on the same facts

The Board denied Menwiththepot Ltd.’s petition to cancel, a request to remove an existing registration, which is an official record of a mark for listed products.

  • Claim preclusion
  • Split decision
October 15, 2026Read the story →

October 2026

  1. AURI
    AURI AGRICULTURAL UTILIZATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE, Reg. No. 4283975
    v.

    Applied-for mark

    Opposer’s mark

    Oct 13, 2026/Decision Desk

    Board dismisses AURI application challenge after finding gummies unrelated to institute’s services

    Ejec Ventures, LLC applied to register AURI for nutritional supplements in the form of gummies.

    • Likelihood of confusion
    • Application proceeds

    Read the story →

  2. NATIVE DV

    Applied-for mark

    Oct 1, 2026/Decision Desk

    Board refuses registration of NATIVE DUAL VOLTAGE and NATIVE DV for battery packs

    Core SWX, LLC sought to register NATIVE DUAL VOLTAGE and NATIVE DV for battery packs.

    • Mere descriptiveness
    • Registration refused

    Read the story →

September 2026

  1. FORT WORTH BRAIN & SPINE INSTITUTE

    Applied-for mark

    Sep 29, 2026/Decision Desk

    The Board refused to register FORT WORTH BRAIN & SPINE INSTITUTE after finding no applicant use

    The Board refused to register FORT WORTH BRAIN & SPINE INSTITUTE after finding that the applicant had never used the mark before filing.

    • Non-ownership
    • Nonuse
    • Registration refused

    Read the story →

  2. Sep 27, 2026/Enforcement Watch

    Nine Hims Oppositions in One Day: The New Filings and What Happened in Its Earlier Cases

    Nine filings, seven HER-formative names and the same 22 registrations. A look at what Hims alleges and how its earlier closed oppositions ended.

    Read the story →

  3. PET-AGREE GROOMING SUPPLIES
    PEDIGREE
    v.

    Applied-for mark

    Opposer’s mark

    Sep 17, 2026/Decision Desk

    PAGS cannot register PET - AGREE GROOMING SUPPLIES after its earlier PET - AGREE ruling

    • Claim preclusion
    • Registration refused

    Read the story →

  4. DERMALIZE

    Challenged registration

    Sep 14, 2026/Decision Desk

    Saniderm keeps DERMALIZE registered because D-Lize did not establish it could bring the case

    • Entitlement to sue
    • Registration stays

    Read the story →

  5. BIRTH JUSTICE, Serial No. 90387461
    BIRTH JUSTICE, Serial No. 97062312
    v.

    Applied-for mark

    Opposer’s mark

    Sep 11, 2026/Precedent Alert

    Emily Grace Thomas cannot register BIRTH JUSTICE logo because she did not own it when she applied

    Emily Grace Thomas sought to register the BIRTH JUSTICE logo for birth injury legal services.

    • Non-ownership
    • Registration refused

    Read the story →

  6. SCENTLY
    SCENTLY, Serial No. 97082461
    v.

    Applied-for mark

    Opposer’s mark

    Sep 9, 2026/Decision Desk

    The Board dismissed Scently’s SCENTLY challenge after finding earlier use on specific goods unproved

    • Likelihood of confusion
    • Fraud
    • Application proceeds

    Read the story →

  7. ZOCY

    Challenged registration

    Sep 4, 2026/Decision Desk

    Mango Republic keeps ZOCY registered for jump ropes after challenger offers no evidence of its interest

    • Entitlement to sue
    • Registration stays

    Read the story →

  8. O EL CIELO VALLE DE GUADALUPE
    CIELO
    v.

    Applied-for mark

    Opposer’s mark

    Sep 4, 2026/Precedent Alert

    The Board says O EL CIELO VALLE DE GUADALUPE cannot register for wine over CIELO

    Hoteles y Viñedos del Valle de Guadalupe S.A. de C.V. sought a registration, a formal trademark record, for O EL CIELO VALLE DE GUADALUPE for wine.

    • Likelihood of confusion
    • Registration refused

    Read the story →

  9. LITTLE ANITA'S

    Applied-for mark

    Sep 4, 2026/Decision Desk

    Green Chili cannot register LITTLE ANITA’S for restaurants because Little Anita’s used it first

    • Likelihood of confusion
    • Registration refused

    Read the story →

  10. ADOLPHE SAX & CIE

    Challenged registration

    Sep 4, 2026/Decision Desk

    Board keeps ADOLPHE SAX & CIE registration after finding no three-year gap in use

    • Abandonment
    • Registration stays

    Read the story →

  11. HU$LANAIRE APPAREL, Reg. No. 7009291
    YOUNG HUSTLLIONAIRE
    v.

    Challenged registration

    Petitioner’s mark

    Sep 2, 2026/Decision Desk

    Galvan kept his registration after Mathis failed to submit evidence to prove his claim

    • Failure of proof
    • Registration stays

    Read the story →

August 2026

  1. EARTHBORN SUITES
    BORN
    v.

    Applied-for mark

    Opposer’s mark

    Aug 28, 2026/Decision Desk

    Four EARTHBORN marks refused registration; HOTEL BORN registration will be removed

    • Likelihood of confusion
    • Abandonment
    • Registration refused · HOTEL BORN registration cancelled

    Read the story →

  2. INVICTUS FITNESS
    INVICTUS
    v.

    Applied-for mark

    Opposer’s mark

    Aug 25, 2026/Decision Desk

    Earlier INVICTUS fitness use means Invictus Fitness LLC cannot register INVICTUS FITNESS

    • Likelihood of confusion
    • Registration refused

    Read the story →

  3. WEFIXIT GARAGE DOOR & GATE
    WE FIX GARAGE DOORS RIGHT!
    v.

    Applied-for mark

    Opposer’s mark

    Aug 24, 2026/Decision Desk

    WEFIXIT GARAGE DOOR & GATE cannot register for door services after Board finds likely confusion

    • Likelihood of confusion
    • Registration refused

    Read the story →

  4. HOP, Serial No. 98198613
    TOP
    v.

    Applied-for mark

    Opposer’s mark

    Aug 21, 2026/Decision Desk

    Board finds stylized HOP vaping mark likely to seem connected to TOP tobacco goods

    • Likelihood of confusion
    • Registration refused

    Read the story →

  5. BREWER, Reg. No. 6382640
    DICK BREWER SURFBOARDS, Reg. No. 1753982
    v.

    Challenged registration

    Petitioner’s mark

    Aug 20, 2026/Decision Desk

    The Board dismissed Brewer Brothers’ bid to cancel BENEFIT Co.’s registration because no evidence was filed

    • Failure of proof
    • Registration stays

    Read the story →

How we report

We distinguish parties’ allegations from Board findings and procedural outcomes. Historical figures identify the party, period and records counted. Each report links to its sources.

Explore TTAB proceedings · All GleanMark Insights

Get each new story by email

One email when the Desk publishes a new story, usually twice a week.

Unsubscribe anytime. Privacy

Browse by month

Index

Decisions by quarter and groundEach decision under the issue it turned on, with its outcome.Precedent libraryFifteen cases behind §2(d) and §2(e)(1) refusals: what each held, and how it is cited.

Explore TTAB proceedings

GM
GleanMark

Trademark intelligence for prosecution attorneys.

Stay updated

For founders: glean.name ↗, a free trademark and domain check for startup names.

Product

  • Trademark Lookup
  • Clearance Reports
  • Office Actions
  • OA Drafting
  • Office Action Research
  • TTAB Research
  • Watch Alerts
  • Deadline Management
  • Markus AI™
  • All features
  • Pricing

Resources

  • Free Trademark Search
  • Office Action Decoder (free)
  • Insights
  • TTAB Desk
  • USPTO Guide
  • Precedents
  • State of Trademark Filings
  • Trademark Classes

Compare

  • GleanMark vs USPTO
  • GleanMark vs Corsearch
  • GleanMark vs TM TKO
  • GleanMark + Alt Legal
  • GleanMark vs LegalZoom
  • GleanMark vs Clarivate

Company

  • About Us
  • Press Kit
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Help Center

© 2026 TMZap Incorporated | All rights reserved.

256-bit SSL
SecurityPrivacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie PolicySubprocessorsAffiliate Disclosure