Search 2.3 million real USPTO office action cases by refusal type, examiner, class, outcome, or the exact argument the examiner made — then build coexistence and crowded-field evidence, check fame, and search the ID Manual, all in one workspace.
14 days of Professional included. No credit card.
2.3M+
Office action cases analyzed
491K+
§2(d) refusals to research
2,900+
Examining attorneys tracked
74K+
ID Manual identifications
Full-text search across all recent OA cases. Filter by refusal type (Section 2(d), descriptiveness, specimen, disclaimer, and 20+ others), outcome (registered/abandoned/pending), examiner, Nice class, OA date, and response status.
Point at your serial number and the system fingerprints your refusal grounds, argument hooks, classes, and examiner, then retrieves the most analogous prosecuted cases — progressively relaxing the criteria until it lands a useful cohort. Then select the winners for an AI strategy analysis.
Every case links to a full detail page with the original office action text, the response text, winning and losing arguments, cited marks, and a prosecution timeline.
The same workspace builds the rest of your Section 2(d) response — coexistence, crowded-field, and fame evidence — plus the ID Manual you need to file.
Auto-pull the examiner’s own §2(d) citations, find similar marks already coexisting on the register under different owners, and download a ready-to-file exhibit bundle — the In re Thor Tech argument, pre-built.
Count the live registered and pending marks that already share a cited formative, with class distribution and largest-owner clusters — the “the cited mark is weak” argument in one click.
Gauge whether a mark is famous — and famous in your market — across four verdict tiers, with a 45-class footprint grid and TTAB-enforcement signals, to size up broadened §2(d) or dilution risk.
Search 74,000+ pre-approved USPTO identifications with plain-English queries and real usage data — the fastest way to dodge the $200-per-class free-form surcharge.
Research that used to take hours now takes minutes.
Search by mark name, refusal type, examiner, or any keyword in the OA text — or enter your serial number to auto-find the most similar prosecuted cases.
Narrow by refusal type and the exact argument the examiner made, plus outcome, Nice class, examiner, OA date, and response status. Each result shows the mark, refusal badges, outcome, and goods.
Open any case to read the actual office action and response side by side. See extracted winning and losing arguments, cited marks, and the prosecution timeline.
Select winning cases for an AI strategy analysis, then carry the case you want to model straight into OA Drafting with “Draft Response Using This Strategy.”
Research tools built for trademark professionals handling office actions.
Search the actual text of office actions and responses — not just metadata. Find cases mentioning specific legal arguments, TMEP sections, or examiner reasoning.
Filter by 20+ refusal types with subtypes (Section 2(d), descriptiveness, specimen, disclaimer, identification, and more), then drill into the exact argument the examiner made with 36 Section 2(d) argument hooks read from the OA text.
Point at your serial number and auto-retrieve the most analogous prosecuted cases — matched on refusal grounds, argument hooks, overlapping classes, and examiner, then progressively relaxed until it lands a useful cohort.
Select a handful of winning cases and get an AI-synthesized playbook — common winning arguments, per-examiner tendencies, and a recommended response structure with citations, copyable or downloadable as Markdown.
Winning and losing arguments are extracted and scored for effectiveness — including why the losing arguments failed — so you learn from both sides of the register.
Found the case you want to model? The “Draft Response Using This Strategy” button on any case carries it straight into GleanMark’s OA Drafting tool.
What used to take hours of case-by-case TSDR searches now takes minutes.
| Feature | GM GleanMark USPTO Research | TSDR / Manual | Traditional Watch |
|---|---|---|---|
| OA case database | All recent cases, full text | One case at a time | Not available |
| Refusal type filtering | 20+ types with subtypes | Not available | Manual review |
| Full-text search | OA and response text | Not available | N/A |
| Find similar cases | Auto-retrieval, scored 0–100 | Not available | Manual research |
| Argument extraction | Winning + losing with scores | Not available | Manual analysis |
| Time to research | Minutes | Hours per case | Hours |
USPTO Research is included at no additional cost.
Real feedback from trademark professionals using GleanMark
Sign off with confidence
“I use GleanMark across clearance, office action responses, and general research. What sets it apart from the other trademark tools is the depth of the record underneath GleanMark. On clearance, it surfaces the conflicting marks thoroughly and gives me enough on each one to make my own call and sign off with confidence, instead of relying on a black-box ranking. On office action responses, it brings not just the arguments but the actual evidence behind them. And for day-to-day research, I can get a straight answer on any owner, any proceeding, or any single mark in seconds.”
Jessica Fleetham
Trademark Attorney, Evia Law
Built for decisions
“Most trademark tools are built for search. GleanMark is built for decisions—it gives you the full picture on any mark in seconds instead of clicking through five government databases.”
Daniel Glantz
Attorney—Branding, Licensing & IP
Game-changer
“Every time I'm vetting a new brand name, I used to spend hours Googling, checking domain availability, and then paying hundreds of dollars for a trademark clearance report that took days to come back. GleanMark lets me search 14 million trademarks, check domains, and get a real answer in seconds—for free. It's a game-changer for anyone launching a new brand or startup.”
Cliff Lerner
Founder & Investor, Author of Explosive Growth
Search 2.3M+ office actions, find similar cases, build coexistence and fame evidence, and see which arguments won.
Start Free14 days of Professional included. No credit card.