Aeronics, Inc. (P) vs Ten Digital Pte. Ltd. (D)

Not Instituted
Extensions of Time to Oppose
Sign in to see Aeronics, Inc.’s full record as plaintiff — how many cases they have brought, how often the other side contests, and how many reach a decision on the merits.

Proceeding Details

Proceeding Number

Filing Date

Sep 24, 2026

Last Status Update

Sep 24, 2026

Interlocutory Attorney

Not Assigned

Parties

Plaintiff

Aeronics, Inc.

DENTONS COHEN & GRIGSBY, P.C.

625 LIBERTY AVENUE

PITTSBURGH, PA 15222

Attorney / Correspondent:

MICHAEL E. DUKESDENTONS COHEN & GRIGSBY, P.C.

625 LIBERTY AVENUE

PITTSBURGH, PA 15222

VS

Defendant

PAWPRINT LAB
Ten Digital Pte. Ltd.

STOBBS

214 W. TREMONT AVE, SUITE 303

CHARLOTTE, NC 28203

Attorney / Correspondent:

MATTHEW J. LADENHEIMSTOBBS

214 W. TREMONT AVE, SUITE 303

CHARLOTTE, NC 28203

Mark:

PAWPRINT LAB
Pending
S/N: 99737746

TTAB Documents

Title
Date
Entry #
Category
Code
Actions
EXT GRANTED
Sep 24, 2026
2
Extensions
1011
FIRST 90-DAY REQUEST TO EXT TIME TO OPPOSE
Sep 24, 2026
1
Extensions
1009

Who they are, and how they litigate

An extension of time asks for time — nothing has been pleaded yet. This is the record of the party who filed it.

Aeronics, Inc.

Sign in to see this party’s full TTAB record — how many cases they have brought and defended, how often the other side contests, and how many reach a decision on the merits rather than ending in a default or a withdrawal.

Related Proceedings