Show, don't tell.
Every sample here was generated by GleanMark against the live USPTO database — on real, public marks. Not mockups. Download the actual files and judge the work product yourself.
GLEANMARK
Proceed with CautionClass 42 + 45 · pre-filing clearance
We ran our own brand through our own tool — including the crowded field of GLEAN marks that shaped our story. Real USPTO data, per-mark DuPont likelihood-of-confusion analysis, domain and web-presence signals, and an unedited written verdict. No cherry-picking — this is exactly what the tool produced.
Clearance reports
First-pass clearance with DuPont analysis and a full audit trail.
BARLYTICS
AvoidClass 9, 42
Analytics software — compound "-lytics" mark. AI decomposition, phonetic matching, exact-match detection, DuPont deep dive.
Download Sample PDFCASA VERDE
AvoidClass 43
Restaurant services — Spanish-language mark. Doctrine of Foreign Equivalents, translation analysis, G&S overlap scoring.
Download Sample PDFZENITHFLOW
PromisingClass 35, 42
Business-intelligence SaaS — compound mark exercising component matching and coordinated-class expansion.
Download Sample PDFOffice-action response drafts
Argument-first responses grounded in the refusal and the USPTO registry.
BEAN FLICKERS COFFEE CO.
§2(d) + descriptiveness disclaimer · class 030
We gave GleanMark only the Office Action and asked it to respond. Working blind — no access to the real filing — it produced a case assessment, a ranked argument strategy, and a full Section 2(d) response: argue the marks differ in their entireties (the distinct "COFFEE CO."impression), distinguish Class 30 coffee from the cited Class 32 coffee-flavored ale, and enter the disclaimer.
Then we checked it against the response the applicant's attorney actually filed — and GleanMark had reached the same core strategy. The draft is a starting point for attorney review, with an honest "verify before filing" checklist built in.
Download the full draft (PDF)More sample drafts
BRENOX
Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion
Single-word pharmaceutical mark. Ranked strategies, cited-mark analysis, third-party coexistence evidence, and narrowing amendment language.
Download Sample PDFHYPERCHAT AI
2(d) + specimen + disclaimer
A multi-issue Office Action — likelihood of confusion, specimen refusal, disclaimer requirement, and identification amendment in one structured draft.
Download Sample PDFPOLYAMINE
Section 2(e) descriptiveness
Descriptiveness refusal for a chemical-compound name. Genericness-vs-descriptiveness analysis, Supplemental Register fallback, and a Section 2(f) path.
Download Sample PDFSixty docket events, one clear read
GleanMark read the full Red Bull GmbH v. Bullrun LLC opposition (No. 91181611) and produced an overview, each side's arguments and evidence, and the Board's decision — the kind of back-and-forth that takes hours to piece together by hand.
Best seen live
Some of what GleanMark produces is interactive — alerts, dockets, examiner profiles, and search. Start a free trial to run these on your own marks.
GLEANMARK is GleanMark's own mark. Other samples use fictional brand names. All are run against the live USPTO database — the conflicts, scores, drafting, and analysis are real.
Run it on your own marks.
14-day Professional trial, no credit card. Generate your first clearance report or OA response draft today.
Start Free Trial