Every sample here was generated by GleanMark against the live USPTO database — on real, public marks. Not mockups. Download the actual files and judge the work product yourself.
Monster Energy as opposer, Class 32, since 2002
Class 9, 42 + 45 · pre-filing clearance
A short, coined software name that runs straight into a phonetically identical senior registration — and a dozen near-misses that turn out not to matter. Watch the analysis separate the one real obstacle from the noise: a per-mark du Pont likelihood-of-confusion walk, goods-relatedness scoring that pushes an unrelated medical-software hit down instead of up, domain and web-presence signals, and an unedited written verdict. No cherry-picking — this is exactly what the tool produced.
First-pass clearance with DuPont analysis and a full audit trail.

Class 43
Restaurant services — a Spanish-language mark run through the Doctrine of Foreign Equivalents, with a crowded-field counter-argument the register-only view would miss.
Download Sample PDFArgument-first responses grounded in the refusal and the USPTO registry.
Response to Office Action
Serial No. 99081966 · Mark: THRIVED
Section 2(d) likelihood of confusion · Class 42 · refused over THRIVE GLOBAL
The draft argues the marks differ in their entireties, then shows the cited mark deserves only a narrow scope: 24 THRIVE-formative registrations from 21 owners in Class 42 and related software fields, and the bare word THRIVE already registered alongside THRIVE GLOBAL. It attaches 29 USPTO record printouts in 3 exhibits and ends with a 9-item before-you-file checklist.
One more thing it did on its own: it checked the case status, saw the applicant had already responded, and marked this draft as a comparison, not for filing. That check runs on every case. A starting point for attorney review, not a substitute for it.
See the analysis and the draftGleanMark read the full Red Bull GmbH v. Bullrun LLC opposition (No. 91181611) and produced an overview, each side's arguments and evidence, and the Board's decision — the kind of back-and-forth that takes hours to piece together by hand.
GleanMark reconstructs the full USPTO prosecution history and works out the deadlines along the way. Here's Mattel's HOT WHEELS UNLEASHED: filed in May, an office action in June, answered in August, published in September. Real record, live data.
Every step on one mark’s USPTO record, and the deadlines GleanMark works out from them:
Track a mark and each new step on its record reaches you as an alert. Open deadlines also get reminders 30, 7 and 1 day before they are due.
Three watches a customer could build today, each with a real filing it caught: a conflict with your mark, every stage of one word's filings, and one company's new game filings.
Say HALO for toys and games (Reg. 2,980,043) is yours. Watch its word in its class:
The watch
HALO & HAVEN
TRINITY COMMERCE L.L.C.
Class 28 · Mahjong game mats · filed July 27, 2026
Some of what GleanMark produces is best seen live. Start a free trial to run it on your own marks.
Most samples are built on real, live USPTO applications, named as the public register names them. All are run against the live USPTO database — the conflicts, scores, drafting, and analysis are real.
7-day Professional trial, no credit card. Generate your first clearance report or OA response draft today.
Start Free Trial