Viterra Inc. (P) vs Unknown Defendant (D)
Terminated
Ex Parte Appeal
Sign in to see Viterra Inc.’s full record as plaintiff — how many cases they have brought, how often the other side contests, and how many reach a decision on the merits.
Proceeding Details
Proceeding Number
Filing Date
Mar 4, 2010
Last Status Update
Jun 26, 2012
Interlocutory Attorney
Not Assigned
Parties
Plaintiff
Viterra Inc.
MIDDLETON REUTLINGER
401 SOUTH FOURTH AVENUE, 2500 BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOWER
LOUISVILLE, KY 40202
Attorney / Correspondent:
SCOT A DUVALLMIDDLETON REUTLINGER
401 SOUTH FOURTH AVENUE, 2500 BROWN & WILLIAMSON TOWER
LOUISVILLE, KY 40202
Mark:
XCEED
Abandoned
S/N: 77608885VS
Defendant
Unknown
TTAB Documents
Title | Date | Entry # | Category | Code | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TERMINATED | Jun 26, 2012 | 16 | Status | 999 | |
COURT'S DECISION:AFFIRMED | Apr 27, 2012 | 15 | Decisions | 851 | |
APPEAL TO CAFC | Mar 18, 2011 | 14 | Appeals | 401 | |
BOARD'S DECISION: AFFIRMED | Jan 21, 2011 | 13 | Decisions | 827 | |
SUBMITTED ON BRIEF | Sep 16, 2010 | 12 | Decisions | 793 | |
MEMO FORWARDING REPLY BRIEF | Aug 31, 2010 | 11 | Appeals | 174 | |
REPLY BRIEF | Aug 30, 2010 | 10 | Appeals | 183 | |
EXAMINER'S STATEMENT | Aug 9, 2010 | 9 | Miscellaneous | 173 | |
APPEAL FORWARDED TO EXAMINER FOR BRIEF | Jun 21, 2010 | 8 | Appeals | 181 | |
APPEAL BRIEF | Jun 18, 2010 | 7 | Appeals | 157 | |
PROCEEDINGS RESUMED | Apr 21, 2010 | 6 | Status | 179 | |
RECONSIDERATION DENIED | Apr 6, 2010 | 5 | Decisions | 424 | |
REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION | Mar 4, 2010 | 4 | Motions | 185 | |
INSTITUTED | Mar 4, 2010 | 3 | Status | 128 | |
APPEAL ACKNOWLEDGED; CASE REMANDED | Mar 4, 2010 | 2 | Appeals | 155 | |
APPEAL TO BOARD | Mar 4, 2010 | 1 | Appeals | 158 |
Who they are, and how they litigate
No pleaded registrations are on this docket. This is the record of the party who brought it.
Viterra Inc.
Sign in to see this party’s full TTAB record — how many cases they have brought and defended, how often the other side contests, and how many reach a decision on the merits rather than ending in a default or a withdrawal.