GM
GleanMark
GM
GleanMark
Free Search
Pricing
Security
Book a Demo

Markus Casebook/Docket & analytics

Every Coca-Cola deadline in the next 60 days, in date order.

What does one company have coming due at the USPTO: renewals, declarations of use, office action responses? Here, The Coca-Cola Company's portfolio, sorted into what's done and what still needs action.

Send me a client's company name. Within a day, I'll send back every USPTO deadline on its marks for the next 60 days.

Send me the client

Replies come to me, Howard Katzenberg, GleanMark's founder. Public USPTO records only; please don't send anything confidential. Or write to hkatzenberg@gleanmark.com

Book a walkthrough
Ask Markus this One-page PDFOpen the real session

"Ask Markus this" opens Markus with the question ready to edit (sign-in required; Markus is on paid plans).

Ask MarkusDocket · owner deadlines

What does The Coca-Cola Company have coming due at the USPTO in the next 60 days: renewals, declarations of use, office action responses? Put it in date order.

What Markus checked

  • Read the owner's deadlines
Real session, Sep 27, 2026 · answered in 23 s · public recordRead the answer

The answer

5 live Statement of Use deadlines

Across The Coca-Cola Company's 1,239 marks, here is everything with an action deadline in the next 60 days, in date order:

Due dateMarkDeadline typeStatus
Sep 28, 2026WANTAOffice Action ResponseSatisfied
Oct 5, 2026TASTE THE FEELING§8 & 9 Renewal (9th–10th anniv.)Satisfied
Oct 15, 2026TOPO CHICO COLECCIÓNOffice Action ResponseSatisfied
Oct 21, 2026PEACE TEAStatement of Use (0 of 5 extensions filed)Pending
Oct 21, 2026PEACE HARD TEAStatement of Use (0 of 5 extensions)Pending
Oct 21, 2026PEACE HARD TEAStatement of Use (0 of 5 extensions)Pending
Oct 21, 2026MR PIBBStatement of Use (0 of 5 extensions)Satisfied
Nov 4, 2026COCA-COLA CREATIONSStatement of Use (1 of 5 extensions)Pending
Nov 4, 2026PEACE TEAStatement of Use (1 of 5 extensions)Satisfied
Nov 20, 2026FAN WATERStatement of Use (2 of 5 extensions)Pending

What actually still needs action — five live Statement of Use deadlines: the three PEACE TEA / PEACE HARD TEA applications on Oct 21 (none with an extension filed yet), COCA-COLA CREATIONS on Nov 4, and FAN WATER on Nov 20. The Oct 21 trio is the tight cluster — no extension filed on any of them, so a use decision or extension request is due in ~3 weeks. Both Office Action responses and the Oct 5 §8/§9 renewal for TASTE THE FEELING already show as satisfied.

Markus · live run Sep 27, 2026 Read the owner's deadlines 23 secondsRead the unedited session

Why this needs a docket

A general model has never seen Coca-Cola's docket. Markus read the deadlines GleanMark works out from the USPTO record across the company's portfolio, and separated what's already satisfied from what still needs action.

Pending dates checked against the USPTO record: the notices of allowance for the three PEACE TEA / PEACE HARD TEA applications issued Apr 21, 2026, putting their Statements of Use due Oct 21; COCA-COLA CREATIONS and FAN WATER each carry an approved extension, with next deadlines Nov 4 and Nov 20. The 1,239 is the count of records filed under THE COCA-COLA COMPANY; 59 more use the spelling "The Coca-Cola Company" (one of them live), and none of those has a deadline in this window. The raw session goes on to discuss past maintenance deadlines; that part is left out here. Public USPTO data; the company appears only as an example.

More from the Casebook

All 10 sessions

01TTAB

The Board's own words on fraud, quoted from nine precedential decisions.

I'm preparing an opposition that includes a fraud claim. What exactly does the Board require to prove fraud, and which precedential TTAB decisions set that standard? I especially want any cases on whether a false statement about use, or a bad specimen, was enough.

9 precedential decisionsRead it

02TTAB

Sixty-five cases since 2021. Not one argued to a decision on the merits.

My client's drinkware brand just received an extension of time to oppose from YETI Coolers. What has YETI opposed or tried to cancel over the last five years, what kinds of marks does it go after, and how did those cases end? Does it usually litigate to a decision or settle?

65 proceedings · no merits rulingRead it

03TTAB

It scouted the opposer's litigation record before the opposition was even filed.

My client's BEASTFUEL application (Class 32, energy drinks) just drew an extension of time to oppose from Monster Energy. How seriously should we take it — do they follow through, and what do they actually target?

Take it seriouslyRead it

The best demo is your own docket.

Ask Markus about your marks, your clients, your deadlines, your opposer. It's on every paid plan: 5 messages a month on Starter, unlimited on Professional and Max.

Send me the client Book a walkthrough

Replies come to me, Howard Katzenberg, GleanMark's founder. Public USPTO records only; please don't send anything confidential. Or write to hkatzenberg@gleanmark.com

Every Markus response shown is genuine, unscripted product output from a live run (dated on each session), condensed for space, never rewritten. The attorneys and clients in the scenarios are invented, inspired by the kinds of questions practitioners ask; no GleanMark customer's matter or wording is used. Every mark, owner, serial number, registration number, disclaimer finding and ID Manual Term ID was independently re-verified against the USPTO record, and where Markus got something wrong or couldn't confirm it, the session says so. Markus produces research and first drafts for review by a qualified practitioner. It is a research tool, not legal advice.

GM
GleanMark

Trademark intelligence for prosecution attorneys.

Stay updated

For founders: glean.name ↗, a free trademark and domain check for startup names.

Product

  • Trademark Lookup
  • Clearance Reports
  • Office Actions
  • OA Drafting
  • Office Action Research
  • TTAB Research
  • Watch Alerts
  • Deadline Management
  • Markus AI™
  • All features
  • Pricing

Resources

  • Free Trademark Search
  • Office Action Decoder (free)
  • Insights
  • TTAB Desk
  • Precedents
  • State of Trademark Filings
  • Trademark Classes

Compare

  • GleanMark vs USPTO
  • GleanMark vs Corsearch
  • GleanMark vs TM TKO
  • GleanMark + Alt Legal
  • GleanMark vs LegalZoom
  • GleanMark vs Clarivate

Company

  • About Us
  • Press Kit
  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Help Center

© 2026 TMZap Incorporated | All rights reserved.

256-bit SSL
SecurityPrivacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie PolicySubprocessorsAffiliate Disclosure