Google Filed PIXELSNAP Days Before Naming Its MagSafe Rival — Inside a Top-Three August on the Trademark Register
Two days before Google publicly unveiled Pixelsnap, the magnetic charging system that became the headline accessory story of the Pixel 10 launch, the company had already done the quiet part: on Aug.
Founder, GleanMark
Two days before Google publicly unveiled Pixelsnap, the magnetic charging system that became the headline accessory story of the Pixel 10 launch, the company had already done the quiet part: on Aug. 21 it filed PIXELSNAP at the USPTO. Google opened pre-orders for Pixel 10 and the Pixelsnap accessories on Aug. 28, with in-store availability the same day. The register saw the name first. That is the whole pitch of trademark intelligence in one filing.
It was also a busy month underneath that headline. August 2025 logged 53,722 applications — the third-strongest August since 2016, behind only the pandemic-era surges of 2020 and 2021. The summer dip from July is the wrong frame. Through August, 2025 is running 5.4% ahead of 2024, and the hottest large class is software and technology services, where Class 42 jumped 34% year over year.
"The trademark register is the cleanest public preview of a company's product roadmap. Companies just don't realize how early they're talking."
We think the strength likely reflects three overlapping forces: AI and software-company formation, e-commerce sellers filing for marketplace and brand-registry reasons, and applicants adjusting to newer filing-fee economics. None of those alone explains the month. Together, they explain why August looked less like a seasonal slowdown and more like a market still forming brands at scale.
What We Found
- August was a top-three month for its calendar slot. 53,722 applications made it the third-strongest August since 2016 — a weak month does not finish third.
- The year is pulling ahead. 413,012 filings through August, up 5.4% from 391,832 a year earlier and the strongest year-to-date total since 2021.
- Software and technology services broke out. Class 42 claims rose 34% year over year, the steepest gain in the top five classes.
- Google named its Pixel accessory line on the register before it named it on stage. The PIXELSNAP filing predated the public announcement by two days.
- Dior and Volkswagen tied atop the TTAB plaintiff list with 10 proceedings each — a fashion house and a carmaker policing very different brand neighborhoods.
Filing Volume
| Month | Total Filings | MoM Change |
|---|---|---|
| August 2024 | 50,411 | — |
| September 2024 | 51,308 | 1.8% |
| October 2024 | 52,967 | 3.2% |
| November 2024 | 47,795 | -9.8% |
| December 2024 | 53,459 | 11.9% |
| January 2025 | 61,451 | 14.9% |
| February 2025 | 38,348 | -37.6% |
| March 2025 | 52,969 | 38.1% |
| April 2025 | 52,785 | -0.3% |
| May 2025 | 48,440 | -8.2% |
| June 2025 | 50,447 | 4.1% |
| July 2025 | 54,850 | 8.7% |
| August 2025 | 53,722 | -2.1% |
The 2.1% month-over-month slip from July is real and uninteresting. The comparison that matters is August against prior Augusts, where 53,722 filings beat every year on record except 2020 and 2021. And after January's 61,451 spike and February's 38,348 trough, volume has spent six straight months locked inside a narrow 48,440-to-54,850 band. That is a market with a floor.
Every August, 2016–2025
| Year | August Filings |
|---|---|
| 2016 | 35,376 |
| 2017 | 42,453 |
| 2018 | 41,601 |
| 2019 | 44,001 |
| 2020 | 62,525 |
| 2021 | 54,243 |
| 2022 | 46,827 |
| 2023 | 49,678 |
| 2024 | 50,411 |
| 2025 | 53,722 |
The 2020 and 2021 peaks were not normal demand — they were the COVID-era e-commerce boom that the whole industry has spent three years digesting. That 2025 has climbed back above the 2024, 2023 and 2022 reads suggests the post-bubble floor is rising, not eroding.
Year-to-date filings through August
| Year | Filings Through August |
|---|---|
| 2021 | 474,243 |
| 2022 | 382,265 |
| 2023 | 366,550 |
| 2024 | 391,832 |
| 2025 | 413,012 |
Year over year, August itself rose 6.6%, from 50,411 to 53,722.
NICE Class Leaderboard
| Rank | NICE Class | Description | Filings | MoM | YoY |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | Electrical and scientific apparatus; downloadable software; electronics | 7,054 | -1.7% | 16.1% |
| 2 | 41 | Education, entertainment, sports, and cultural services | 6,597 | -1.8% | 18.6% |
| 3 | 35 | Advertising, business management, retail, and marketplace services | 6,020 | 1.9% | 8.4% |
| 4 | 25 | Clothing, footwear, and headwear | 5,524 | -1.7% | 4.8% |
| 5 | 42 | Scientific and technological services; software as a service | 5,430 | 0.8% | 34% |
| 6 | 3 | Cosmetics, cleaning preparations, and personal-care goods | 2,951 | 0.4% | 12.8% |
| 7 | 5 | Pharmaceuticals, supplements, and medical preparations | 2,742 | -5.7% | 13.1% |
| 8 | 28 | Toys, games, sporting goods, and playthings | 2,652 | -2.8% | 2.7% |
| 9 | 21 | Household and kitchen utensils; cookware; glassware | 2,504 | -3.3% | -10.7% |
| 10 | 16 | Paper goods, printed matter, stationery, and office supplies | 2,276 | 4% | 8.4% |
| 11 | 36 | Insurance, financial affairs, monetary affairs, and real estate | 2,191 | 1.5% | 10.7% |
| 12 | 20 | Furniture, mirrors, picture frames, and non-metal containers | 1,972 | -1.6% | 4.1% |
| 13 | 44 | Medical, beauty, agriculture, and veterinary services | 1,794 | 3.3% | 14.5% |
| 14 | 30 | Coffee, tea, bakery goods, confectionery, and staple foods | 1,653 | -2.7% | 2.6% |
| 15 | 11 | Lighting, heating, cooling, cooking, and sanitary apparatus | 1,502 | -5.8% | -4.5% |
The top of this table is the modern trademark economy in miniature: software and electronics, entertainment, retail services, apparel, technical services. The move worth your attention is Class 42. Its 34% year-over-year jump is more than triple the next-fastest top-five class, and it is the kind of growth you see when companies rush to protect a service name before the product story is public — exactly the behavior the PIXELSNAP filing demonstrates a few sections down.
One unit note for the whole report: NICE figures count class claims, not applications, because a single application can cover several classes. So Class 42's surge is a signal about what brands are protecting, not a one-for-one driver of the month's application count. With that caveat handled once, the mix still tells a clean story — Classes 21 and 11 fell year over year while software, entertainment, health and services all gained. The register is tilting toward bits over atoms.
Top Filing Owners
| Owner | Filings | Prior Month | MoM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Xiaoting Liao | 36 | 13 | 176.9% |
| ARISTOCRAT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | 33 | 17 | 94.1% |
| WALMART APOLLO, LLC | 33 | 10 | 230% |
| XIN, WANG | 30 | 0 | — |
| YIWEI ZHANG | 30 | 6 | 400% |
| Luxpatio Inc. | 26 | 0 | — |
| Guangzhou Jinchen Trading Co.,Ltd. | 25 | 15 | 66.7% |
| Ghost Global LLC | 23 | 16 | 43.8% |
| GAMES GLOBAL USA INC. | 22 | 18 | 22.2% |
| REFIK ANADOL STUDIO, LLC | 22 | 0 | — |
| Total Biotecnologia Industria e Comercio S/A | 22 | 0 | — |
| LIGHT & WONDER, INC. | 21 | 33 | -36.4% |
Two patterns jump out. First, gaming is everywhere: Aristocrat, Games Global, and Light & Wonder are all slot-and-casino content houses, and their portfolios churn titles the way studios churn show names. Second, the volume leaders are not famous brands running campaigns — they are individual filers and overseas trading companies arriving in bulk, several of them from a standing start of zero the month before. That is the trademark system we actually have now. We think e-commerce and brand-registry incentives keep pulling smaller sellers to the USPTO earlier than they would have filed a decade ago. The lone art-world name, Refik Anadol Studio, is the interesting outlier — a generative-art practice filing 22 marks is its own small signal about how AI artists are starting to think about IP.
Top Correspondent Firms
| Firm | Filings | Prior Month | MoM |
|---|---|---|---|
| LZ Legal Services, LLC | 987 | 1,293 | -23.7% |
| Overseas Operation Services, Inc. DBA Flatfee Corp. | 832 | 692 | 20.2% |
| Swyft Legal LLC | 735 | 746 | -1.5% |
| Alioth Law P.C. | 492 | 581 | -15.3% |
| LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C. | 419 | 332 | 26.2% |
| OUTSOURCE ASIA | 322 | 330 | -2.4% |
| Grogan, Tuccillo & Vanderleedeen, LLP | 300 | 218 | 37.6% |
| Sparring Legal LLP | 286 | 274 | 4.4% |
| All West Law Group, PLLC | 275 | 354 | -22.3% |
| Brown Brothers Law LLP | 270 | 300 | -10% |
| BAYRAMOGLU LAW OFFICES LLC | 230 | 186 | 23.7% |
High-throughput filing channels still own this leaderboard, and the churn within it is the story. LZ Legal stayed the largest mapped correspondent at 987 filings even after shedding nearly a quarter of its July volume, while Flatfee Corp. surged 20.2% to 832 — the kind of volume reshuffling you get when commoditized intake shops compete on price. Grogan, Tuccillo & Vanderleedeen is the contrast: a traditional named firm up 37.6% to 300, suggesting it is winning work that does not flow through automated pipes.
Notable Filings
Google: PIXELSNAP and ANDROIDIFY
This is the marquee pairing of the month. Google filed ANDROIDIFY on Aug. 19 and PIXELSNAP on Aug. 21. Both landed within days of public events. Pixelsnap is Google's Qi2-based magnetic charging system for the Pixel 10 series, with a charger, ring stand, and compatible cases.
Google opened Pixel 10 and Pixelsnap pre-orders on Aug. 28, with in-store availability the same day — meaning the Aug. 21 filing beat the public reveal by roughly a week. The register named the product first.
ANDROIDIFY is the inverse case, and a useful reminder not to over-read a filing as "new." Androidify is an open-source Google app for building AI-driven avatars that was shown to attendees at Google I/O in May 2025.
Google released the revamped AI-powered app and website in early September 2025, alongside the Android 16 QPR1 launch and the September Pixel Drop, after the original app was pulled in 2020. So the August filing sits between an I/O demo and a September consumer launch — a company protecting a name it had already shown and was about to ship, not telegraphing a secret.
Netflix: KPOP DEMON HUNTERS and STRANGER THINGS: TALES FROM '85
Neither of these is a roadmap leak; both are Netflix building the legal scaffolding around properties it has already announced. KPOP DEMON HUNTERS was filed Aug. 27. The film began streaming on Netflix on June 20, 2025, and by year's end became the most-watched original title in Netflix history with over 500 million views.
A sing-along version had a limited theatrical release on Aug. 23–24 — days before the filing — which is the more plausible trigger than the film itself: a megahit going to theaters and merchandise is exactly when you expand a trademark portfolio.
STRANGER THINGS: TALES FROM '85, filed Aug. 19, protects a spin-off Netflix had already named publicly. Tales from '85 is an animated spin-off of Stranger Things that Netflix first announced in April 2025. The August filing is brand maintenance ahead of release, not a reveal.
Amazon: HOLIDAY CRUSH, TWO MUCH WITH KAJOL & TWINKLE, CAN YOU SUMMON 100 FRIENDS?, and MARCH OF GIANTS
Amazon Technologies filed three marks on Aug. 28 — HOLIDAY CRUSH, TWO MUCH WITH KAJOL & TWINKLE, and CAN YOU SUMMON 100 FRIENDS? — and MARCH OF GIANTS the day before. We were unable to match these to publicly announced products. TWO MUCH WITH KAJOL & TWINKLE reads unmistakably as a Bollywood-celebrity talk or variety format (Kajol and Twinkle Khanna are both well-known Indian film figures), which points toward Prime Video's India slate; the others read like entertainment, game, or interactive-format titles. We are describing what the names suggest, not asserting an unannounced product — that is a negative we cannot prove.
Disney: DISNEY HEXED
Disney Enterprises filed DISNEY HEXED on Aug. 30. We found no clear public counterpart; "Hexed" reads like a title-style mark, the kind that can grow a long merchandising tail across consumer products, games, publishing and live experiences if the underlying property travels. The name fits the witch-and-villain register Disney mines well — see the studio's existing Japanese mobile hit Disney Twisted-Wonderland — but we are not connecting HEXED to any specific title without evidence.
Samsung: SAMSUNG MUSIC STUDIO
Samsung Electronics filed SAMSUNG MUSIC STUDIO on Aug. 28. We did not find an announced product under this exact name. It reads like a software feature or creative tool rather than hardware, which is the category hardware makers increasingly need to protect: phones and tablets now differentiate on software layers as much as on specs.
Nike: CC
Nike filed CC on Aug. 26. Two-letter marks look minor until they land on a shoe. We could not tie "CC" to a specific public product. The point is not that the mark tells a story — it doesn't — but that short, stitchable identifiers are valuable enough in consumer goods that Nike spends real prosecution effort on them.
TTAB Activity
| Type | Filings | Prior Month | MoM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oppositions | 593 | 711 | -16.6% |
| Cancellations | 230 | 269 | -14.5% |
| Plaintiff | Proceedings Filed |
|---|---|
| PARFUMS CHRISTIAN DIOR (S.A.) | 10 |
| VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT | 10 |
| JEAN PATOU | 9 |
| AMAZON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | 8 |
| MCDONALDS CORPORATION | 7 |
| MATTEL, INC. | 6 |
| HUGO BOSS AG | 5 |
| CATERPILLAR, INC. | 5 |
Oppositions and cancellations both fell from July, but the plaintiff bench is brand-heavy, and the top is a study in contrasts. Dior and Volkswagen tied at 10 proceedings each — a luxury fragrance-and-fashion house and a global automaker enforce in completely different brand neighborhoods. Worth noting: Dior and Jean Patou both sit inside the LVMH orbit, so the fragrance-and-fashion enforcement at the top of this table is more concentrated than it first looks. The mix matters more than the headline decline; this table shows enforcement posture, not case merits.
Registration Rates
| Cohort Month | Total Filed | Registered | Registration Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| August 2024 | 50,411 | 16,219 | 32.2% |
| July 2024 | 50,715 | 18,534 | 36.5% |
| June 2024 | 46,732 | 18,825 | 40.3% |
| May 2024 | 51,570 | 25,544 | 49.5% |
| April 2024 | 51,609 | 25,430 | 49.3% |
| March 2024 | 48,993 | 25,018 | 51.1% |
| February 2024 | 43,788 | 21,610 | 49.4% |
| January 2024 | 48,014 | 25,921 | 54% |
| December 2023 | 44,949 | 24,743 | 55% |
| November 2023 | 45,415 | 24,396 | 53.7% |
| October 2023 | 44,807 | 23,194 | 51.8% |
| September 2023 | 45,956 | 24,163 | 52.6% |
Read this table back-to-front. Older cohorts cluster in the low 50s; the most recent ones drop because they have not finished prosecuting. The August 2024 cohort's 32.2% is a timing artifact, not a quality verdict — those applications are still working through the office.
Practitioner Takeaways
- Treat August as a strong market, not a summer lull. A 53,722-filing month that ranks third among Augusts since 2016 deserves year-over-year framing before anyone calls it soft.
- Tighten Class 42 identifications now. A 34% year-over-year jump means more crowded clearance and more overlap — vague software-and-services language will cost you on the back end.
- Mine late-August entertainment and device filings for timing. PIXELSNAP beat its own product reveal; that gap is where the intelligence lives.
- Don't read the TTAB dip as détente. August still brought 593 oppositions and 230 cancellations, with luxury, automotive, tech, food, toy, apparel and industrial owners all active at the Board.
Methodology: figures cover USPTO trademark applications by filing date, from GleanMark's mirror of the full USPTO dataset (~14M records). Recent-month filings are ~99% pending — prosecution timing, not outcomes; registration rates use cohorts old enough to have matured. NICE figures count class claims, not applications. Firm totals cover filings mapped to a correspondent (~70% of the month). Informational, not legal advice.
Explore more USPTO data analysis on the GleanMark Insights blog.
More in this series
Previous: July 2025 · Next: September 2025 · Browse all filing reports
Related Articles
2026 Is Filing Trademarks Faster Than Any Year Since the 2021 Boom
June 4, 2026
USPTO Trademark Filings Posted Their Second-Strongest May in 11 Years
June 4, 2026
Nike Filed Bronny James's 'B9' Logo in February. By April, the USPTO Said No.
June 4, 2026