Statistical Analysis

Nike Filed Bronny James's 'B9' Logo in February. By April, the USPTO Said No.

The most newsworthy thing on the February register isn't a number — it's a two-character mark.

By Howard Katzenberg
June 4, 2026
20 min read

Founder, GleanMark

The most newsworthy thing on the February register isn't a number — it's a two-character mark. On February 27, Nike filed B9 (99673726), the stylized logo tied to Bronny James's emerging signature line. On April 13th, the USPTO refused the application; Nike had filed seeking protection of the 'B9' logo for use on footwear, clothing, and sports jerseys, on an intent-to-use basis, meaning Nike hadn't yet launched products with the logo.

The problem: an existing 'B9' trademark is already registered, belonging to Back 9 Golf Apparel, an Austin-based company selling golf apparel under similar 'B9' branding. So when GleanMark's database flags a cryptic alphanumeric Nike filing, the right move isn't to call it "one to watch" — it's to find the conflict that was already sitting on the register.

That is the whole pitch for reading this data closely. February 2026 produced 49,884 USPTO trademark applications, and the monthly total is the least interesting fact in it.

"The register is the cleanest public preview of a company's product roadmap — and companies routinely talk months before they mean to. Nike told the world it wanted Bronny's logo in February. The government told Nike no in April. Both facts were filings before either was a headline."

We think the broader February strength likely reflects a mix of AI and software-startup formation, continued e-commerce and brand-registry behavior, and fee-sensitive timing still working through filing calendars. The register is not a perfect proxy for the economy. It is a very good early-warning system for what companies are trying to name — and, occasionally, for what they will fail to own.

What We Found

  • Nike's B9 filing was dead on arrival. The February 27 application for Bronny James's signature logo was refused weeks later over a prior registration — a clearance failure visible in the data before it was news.
  • February was historically strong, not weak. At 49,884 applications, it was the second-strongest February in the 2016–2026 same-month history, behind only 2021.
  • Year-to-date volume leads everything but 2021. 2026 reached 102,947 filings through February, up 3.2% from 99,799 at the same point in 2025.
  • Software services broke out. Class 42 logged 6,031 class claims, up 60.2% year over year — the largest annual jump in the top five.
  • Samsung Display's QUANTUMBLACK was filed a month before the company announced it. The February 26 filing preceded the March 26 product reveal.

Filing Volume

Monthly filing volume

MonthTotal FilingsMoM Change
Feb. 202649,884-6%
Jan. 202653,063-1.3%
Dec. 202553,7619.7%
Nov. 202549,015-7.5%
Oct. 202552,991-5.4%
Sep. 202556,0264.3%
Aug. 202553,722-2.1%
Jul. 202554,8508.7%
Jun. 202550,4474.1%
May 202548,440-8.2%
Apr. 202552,785-0.3%
Mar. 202552,96938.1%
Feb. 202538,348

Yes, February fell 6% from January. Ignore it. The month-over-month line is the wrong frame for a month that just posted the second-highest February total in eleven years.

February filings by year

Every February, 2016–2026

YearFebruary Filings
201632,462
201733,636
201836,671
201936,375
202035,514
202151,108
202242,341
202341,566
202443,788
202538,348
202649,884

Only February 2021 — the post-pandemic filing boom — topped February 2026 in this same-month history.

Year-to-Date Filings, Jan. 1–Feb. 28

YearYear-to-Date Filings
2021107,633
202290,945
202379,310
202491,802
202599,799
2026102,947

The year-to-date line matters as much as the monthly rank. Through February, 2026 sits at 102,947 filings, ahead of 2025 by 3.2% and second only to the 2021 anomaly. Year over year, February alone jumped 30.1%, from 38,348 applications to 49,884. That is too large a gap to wave off as filing noise. The cleaner read: last February was the soft outlier, depressed below every other February since 2018, and 2026 simply returned the month to where the recent trend already pointed.

NICE Class Leaderboard

RankNICE ClassDescriptionFilingsMoMYoY
141Education; entertainment; sporting and cultural activities7,2204.5%45.3%
29Scientific, electronic, audiovisual, and software goods6,305-2%37.8%
342Scientific and technological services; software design and development6,03114.4%60.2%
435Advertising; business management; business administration5,8788.5%23.7%
525Clothing, footwear, and headwear5,292-8.5%30.5%
65Pharmaceuticals and medical preparations2,597-2.4%18%
73Cosmetics, toiletries, perfumery, and cleaning preparations2,545-12.5%26.2%
828Games, toys, sporting articles, and playthings2,253-6.8%27.5%
936Insurance, financial, monetary, and real estate services2,1136.5%15.5%
1016Paper goods, printed matter, stationery, and office requisites1,898-12.2%33.6%
1121Household and kitchen utensils, containers, and glassware1,823-23.3%23.8%
1244Medical, beauty, agricultural, and veterinary services1,79911.9%20%
1330Coffee, tea, cocoa, bakery goods, and staple foods1,67914%32.2%
1443Food and drink services; temporary accommodation1,4351%28.1%
1520Furniture, mirrors, picture frames, and non-metal containers1,364-21.6%27.7%

The front of the register tells a coherent story: the top three classes are entertainment (41), software goods (9), and software services (42). Class 42 is the one to flag. A 60.2% year-over-year increase in a class already clearing 6,000 claims is not small-base trivia — it is the single fastest-growing category in the top five, by a wide margin over second-place Class 41's 45.3%. Our hypothesis: AI and SaaS formation are doing the heavy lifting here, since "software design and development" is precisely where an AI startup's first application lands.

The consumer classes held up too. Apparel, cosmetics, toys, household goods, and food were all up year over year even where month-to-month numbers softened. One unit note, stated once and not repeated: this table counts class claims, not applications — a single application can claim several classes — so read it for mix and direction, not as a slice of the monthly filing total.

Top Filing Owners

OwnerFilingsPrior MonthMoM
ROC PARTY CO.,LTD.450
Glaxo Group Limited3818111.1%
Biaowu Huang314675%
Futrus, Ltd.310
Elixirgen Therapeutics, Inc.300
WALMART APOLLO, LLC3031-3.2%
LIGHT & WONDER, INC.2829-3.4%
NASDAQ, INC.280
MEDICALINE Sp. z o.o.280
FULCRUMQ LLC260
Aristocrat Interactive S.a r.l258212.5%
Sen Jia240

The owner leaderboard always mixes recognizable companies with batch-heavy filing behavior, and February is no exception. Glaxo, Walmart, Light & Wonder, Nasdaq, and Aristocrat are the names with obvious corporate logic; the zero-to-30 rows — ROC Party, Futrus, several single-name filers — read more like concentrated registration pushes than household-name product strategy. The most interesting tell is gaming: Light & Wonder and Aristocrat Interactive together signal an interactive-entertainment naming cycle, a category that mints marks fast across titles, platforms, and feature names. Aristocrat's jump from 8 to 25 filings is the kind of move that usually precedes a content slate, not a single launch.

Top Correspondent Firms

FirmFilingsPrior MonthMoM
Swyft Legal LLC9438846.7%
LZ Legal Services, LLC83759540.7%
Overseas Operation Services, Inc. DBA Flatfee Corp.6365996.2%
MEDIA LAW GROUP25920725.1%
Grogan, Tuccillo & Vanderleedeen, LLP251478-47.5%
Sparring Legal LLP236297-20.5%
Alioth Law P.C.231458-49.6%
LegalForce RAPC Worldwide, P.C.184197-6.6%
Law On Call, LLC18013731.4%
Kearston Grace Everitt179215-16.7%
LOWELL LEE CARSON JR1761760%
One Juris PC1731608.1%

High-throughput filing channels own the top of this table: Swyft Legal, LZ Legal Services, and Flatfee Corp. sit far ahead of everyone else, with LZ Legal's 41% month-over-month jump the standout move. But look at the middle of the table, where the volatility is. Grogan, Tuccillo & Vanderleedeen and Alioth Law both roughly halved month over month — drops of that size in a single month usually mean a large client portfolio shifted timing or counsel, not that demand collapsed. Among specialist names, Media Law Group's 25% gain to 259 filings is the one moving the right direction.

Notable Filings

OwnerFiling DateMarkSerial NumberStatus
SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.Feb. 24, 2026LEAD THE NEXT WAVE OF DISPLAY 2.099668048Pending
SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.Feb. 26, 2026QUANTUMBLACK99672178Pending
SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.Feb. 26, 2026QUANTUMVIEW99672338Pending
SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.Feb. 26, 2026INTELLISENSE 3.099672430Pending
SAMSUNG DISPLAY CO., LTD.Feb. 26, 2026DUAL-HZ CLARITY99672490Pending
NIKE, INC.Feb. 27, 2026B999673726Pending
NIKE, INC.Feb. 27, 2026CH99673728Pending
NETFLIX STUDIOS, LLCFeb. 25, 2026SCHOOLED!99670307Pending

Nike: B9 (and CH)

The B9 mark is the month's best worked example of why filing data has a shelf life. Nike filed it February 27; the logo is Bronny James's. Nike introduced a stylised version of the "B9" logo that had already been featured on Bronny's on-court sneakers this season. Then the register did what the register does. The USPTO sent a letter of refusal citing "likelihood of confusion" with an already-registered mark by the Back9 Golf Apparel company, stating that Nike's mark is confusingly similar to the registered mark.

Nike could argue the goods target different sports, but that argument is difficult here: because Back 9 Golf's registration doesn't limit itself to golf channels, the USPTO presumes the goods overlap — an issue Nike is not likely to argue around. Even a flat status field — "Pending" in February — was hiding a clearance problem that any conflict search would have surfaced. Nike's companion filing the same day, CH (99673728), is the genuinely opaque one; two-letter marks rarely telegraph intent, and we found no public product tied to it.

Samsung Display: QUANTUMBLACK and the display-feature cluster

Samsung Display filed five marks across three late-February days, and one of them lets us do the timing trick that makes this data valuable. The company filed QUANTUMBLACK (99672178) on February 26. A month later, Samsung Display announced QuantumBlack as a low-reflection, high-durability film for QD-OLED monitors, confirmed it would be applied to all new QD-OLED monitor products launched this year, and noted it had recently completed trademark registration. The reveal landed March 26 — the trademark filing beat the press release by a month. Samsung claims the coating reduces light reflectance by 20% versus its previous generation and raises QD-OLED surface hardness from 2H to 3H.

The rest of the cluster reads as supporting branding for the same display push: QUANTUMVIEW, the refresh-rate-flavored DUAL-HZ CLARITY, INTELLISENSE 3.0, and the slogan-style LEAD THE NEXT WAVE OF DISPLAY 2.0. None of those four had surfaced publicly when we checked. If QUANTUMBLACK is any guide, expect them to appear in 2026 monitor marketing, not on the filing date.

Netflix Studios: SCHOOLED!

Netflix filed SCHOOLED! (99670307) on February 25 — and this is another filing-ahead-of-announcement case, though a shorter lead. On March 2, Netflix detailed SCHOOLED!, a kids-and-family competition show in which former NASA engineer Mark Rober opens a gamified laboratory where teams of young innovators face off in science experiments, produced by Rober's CrunchLabs with Jimmy Kimmel's Kimmelot. The exclamation point in the mark was the tell that this was a title, not a house mark; the filing simply got there five days before the publicity did.

TTAB Activity

TypeFilingsPrior MonthMoM
Oppositions7056479%
Cancellations2382255.8%
PlaintiffProceedings Filed
FUENTE MARKETING, LTD.8
MCDONALDS CORPORATION8
DOTERRA HOLDINGS, LLC7
EDEN FOODS, INC.7
HUGO BOSS TRADE MARK MANAGEMENT GMBH & C6
HUGO BOSS TRADE MARK MANAGEMENT GMBH & CO. KG6
ST. BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC.6
HUGO BOSS AG6
HNI TECHNOLOGIES INC.5
ADIDAS AG5

Both tracks rose: oppositions from 647 to 705, cancellations from 225 to 238. The tie at the top is the story. McDonald's leading with 8 proceedings is unsurprising — a global brand polices across food, retail, and promotions as a matter of routine. The co-leader is not a household name but has a notable history: Fuente Marketing, the Arturo Fuente cigar entity, has fought over the use of the letter "X" in trademarks, including a dispute sparked by a rival's product that drew a cease-and-desist over Fuente's X marks.

In fact, the cigar company spent nearly five years opposing a dab-rig company's effort to register a trademark. Eight proceedings in a single month from a cigar marketer is exactly the kind of outlier the leaderboard exists to catch.

One housekeeping note on the table: Hugo Boss appears under three related owner records, each with 6 proceedings. That is a single brand family fragmented by ownership structure, not three separate campaigns — worth de-duplicating before anyone reads it as the register's most litigious entity.

Registration Rates

Cohort MonthTotal FiledRegisteredRegistration Rate
Feb. 202538,34814,65138.2%
Jan. 202561,45131,44851.2%
Dec. 202453,45926,21049%
Nov. 202447,79522,89547.9%
Oct. 202452,96726,16749.4%
Sep. 202451,30823,18445.2%
Aug. 202450,41116,21932.2%
Jul. 202450,71518,53436.5%
Jun. 202446,73218,82540.3%
May 202451,57025,54449.5%
Apr. 202451,60925,43049.3%
Mar. 202448,99325,01851.1%

Read this table for matured cohorts, not fresh ones. The 2024 cohorts mostly settle in the high-40s to low-50s; the younger February 2025 cohort at 38.2% hasn't finished prosecuting and will keep climbing. Judging February 2026 outcomes off this table would be a mistake — those applications are barely out of the gate.

Practitioner Takeaways

  1. Clear the mark before the athlete wears it. Nike's B9 refusal is a reminder that a high-profile rollout doesn't move the register — a prior registration in the same goods will stop even Nike.
  2. Software clearance stays crowded. Class 42's 60.2% year-over-year jump means heavier competition around software, AI, data, and platform naming. Search budgets should reflect it.
  3. Watch feature names, not just house marks. Samsung Display's QUANTUMBLACK filed a month ahead of its announcement — competitive intelligence often hides in the boring technical descriptors.
  4. More filings, more collisions. TTAB oppositions and cancellations both rose; rising application volume mechanically widens the surface for disputes.

Methodology: figures cover USPTO trademark applications by filing date, from GleanMark's mirror of the full USPTO dataset (~14M records). Recent-month filings are ~99% pending — that reflects prosecution timing, not outcomes; registration rates use cohorts old enough to have matured. NICE class figures count class claims, not applications. Firm totals cover filings mapped to a correspondent (~70% of the month). Informational, not legal advice.

Explore more USPTO data analysis on the GleanMark Insights blog.

More in this series

Previous: January 2026 · Next: March 2026 · Browse all filing reports

Share this article

Put This Research Into Practice

Search 14M USPTO trademarks — no account required.