GM
GleanMark
GM
GleanMark
Free Search
Pricing
Security
Book a Demo

Feature videos · USPTO Research

Feature highlight: Cited Marks research

The Cited Marks tab lists the applications GleanMark has found refused over the same registration, shows which registered anyway, and opens what they filed.

1:33Shown on PICKLE-BALL (Reg. No. 0999043), for paddles, balls and a net.Recorded November 2, 2026Watch on YouTube

Chapters

Who was refused over it

Type the registration's name, and the tab lists the applications GleanMark has found refused over it since January 2025: still pending, abandoned, or registered anyway.

Read what got through

Franklin Sports filed a consent agreement signed with PICKLE-BALL's owner and registered in October. BUILT FOR PICKLEBALL's response amended its wording, entered a disclaimer and argued the marks differ.

Keep it in the file

Filter by class, and download the list as a spreadsheet with links to the refusals and the available responses.

Transcript

Hi! This is Howard Katzenberg, GleanMark's founder. A registration is blocking your client's application. Has anyone else faced that same obstacle and registered anyway? What did they file? GleanMark's Cited Marks tab helps you find those cases and read the responses.

Here's PICKLE-BALL, a registration for paddles, balls, and a net. I type the name and select the registration.

GleanMark lists the applications it has found refused over this registration since January 2025. See which are still pending, which were abandoned, and which registered after the refusal.

Filter by class to focus your research. Here, the cited applications include equipment, clothing, and services, so you can narrow the list to the categories relevant to your client.

I select Registered anyway. Each card shows the refusal and registration dates. When GleanMark has the filed response, you can open it directly.

Take Franklin Sports. Its foam pickleball mark was refused in January. It responded in April, received approval for publication four days later, and registered in October.

Open the response, and you can see what it submitted: a consent agreement signed with the owner of PICKLE-BALL. That's useful context before discussing whether to pursue consent in your own matter.

Another example is BUILT FOR PICKLEBALL, for an online store. Its registered services describe the sport without using the word pickleball. Open its response to review the amended wording, the disclaimer, and its arguments about differences between the marks.

Instead of hunting through application files, you now have responses from applicants that registered after facing this same cited mark. Download the list as a spreadsheet, with links to the refusals and available responses, to keep the research in your file.

Research the registrations cited against your own applications. Start a free trial or book a short walkthrough at gleanmark.com.

See it on your own office actions

Start a free trial and research your next refusal, or book a short walkthrough.

Start a free trialBook a walkthrough

More feature videos

See all videos
2:14

Feature highlight

Office Action Page

2:35

Feature highlight

USPTO Research overview

2:46

Feature highlight

USPTO Research, tab by tab

2:09

Feature highlight

Search Office Actions

1:48

Feature highlight

Thor Tech Pairs evidence

1:51

Feature highlight

Crowded Field evidence

1:54

Feature highlight

Disclaimer research

2:00

Feature highlight

ID Manual wording search

1:42

Feature highlight

Fame Rulings research

2:12

Feature highlight

Office action exhibit builder

6:24

Platform demo

GleanMark platform tour

2:01

Feature highlight

Trademark Search overview

1:49

Feature highlight

Trademark Lookup

2:14

Feature highlight

The Trademark Page

1:49

Feature highlight

Knockout Search

2:30

Feature highlight

Clearance Report

2:06

Feature highlight

Knockout vs Clearance

1:58

Feature highlight

TESS-style trademark search

1:42

Feature highlight

Logo and Image Search

1:45

Feature highlight

TTAB case research

2:33

Feature highlight

Deadline Management

2:03

Feature highlight

Trademark Monitoring

1:46

Feature highlight

Watch Alerts

1:45

Feature highlight

Citation Alerts

1:55

Feature highlight

Auto-Built Portfolios

2:41

Feature highlight

Client Emails

1:25

Feature highlight

Firm Branding

1:00

Feature highlight

Matter Billing

2:12

Feature highlight

Lead Feed

1:57

Feature highlight

Plans and pricing

2:54

Feature highlight

Markus AI paralegal

1:37

Feature highlight

GleanMark in Claude and ChatGPT

GM
GleanMark

Trademark intelligence for prosecution attorneys.

Stay updated

For founders: glean.name ↗, a free trademark and domain check for startup names.

Product

  • Trademark Lookup
  • Clearance Reports
  • Office Action Lookup
  • Office Action Drafting
  • USPTO Research
  • TTAB Research
  • Watch Alerts
  • Automated Docketing
  • Markus AI™
  • All features
  • Pricing

Resources

  • Free Trademark Search
  • Office Action Decoder (free)
  • Insights
  • Feature videos
  • TTAB Desk
  • USPTO Guide
  • Precedents
  • State of Trademark Filings
  • Trademark Classes

Compare

  • GleanMark vs USPTO
  • GleanMark vs Corsearch
  • GleanMark vs TM TKO
  • GleanMark + Alt Legal
  • GleanMark vs LegalZoom
  • GleanMark vs Clarivate

Company

  • About Us
  • Press Kit
  • Contact
  • Partner Program
  • FAQ
  • Help Center

© 2026 TMZap Incorporated | All rights reserved.

256-bit SSL
SecurityStatusPrivacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie PolicySubprocessorsAffiliate Disclosure