GM
GleanMark
GM
GleanMark
Free Search
Pricing
Security
Book a Demo

Feature videos · USPTO Research

Feature highlight: Search Office Actions

Filter real office actions by refusal, outcome, class and the letters' text, read how each applicant responded, and let Analyze Strategy summarize what was argued, the evidence filed, and what followed.

2:09Shown on SUNBURST for razors, refused under 2(d) over SUNBURST for hair care and registered after a response with coexisting registrations, a challenge to the examiner's evidence and third-party uses.Recorded November 5, 2026Watch on YouTube

Chapters

Find responses to the same refusal

Filter office actions by refusal type, outcome and class, search their full text, and keep the cases won by argument alone, with no consent and no change to the goods or the mark.

Read how the applicant answered

Hover over a response date for a summary of what the applicant argued, then open the full response as filed, with its exhibits.

A summary of what worked, and what did not

Analyze Strategy reads about a dozen settled cases in full, registered and abandoned, and summarizes what applicants argued, the evidence they filed, and what followed, each point naming its cases.

Transcript

Hi! This is Howard Katzenberg, GleanMark's founder. In this video, we'll walk you through GleanMark's Office Actions tab and Analyze Strategy. The Office Actions tab searches real office actions and the responses filed to them, so you can see how other office actions were responded to under similar circumstances.

Let's research a likelihood of confusion refusal for razors, where the examiner cited a registration for shampoo. Under Refusal Type, select 2(d) Confusion.

Under Outcome, select Registered. Then select class 8, which includes razors.

Switch the search box to Full Text, which searches the text of office actions and responses, and enter shampoo.

Then, under Response Analysis, select Won by argument alone. It keeps cases where the refusal was withdrawn after argument alone, with no consent and no change to the goods or the mark.

Take SUNBURST, for razors. The examiner refused it over the same name, registered for hair care products, and cited third-party registrations that cover both. Hover over the response date to see how the applicant argued. Identical marks with different owners already share the register, one for razors and one for hair care. The examiner relied on only five third-party registrations. And it pointed to eight third-party uses of SUNBURST for cosmetics.

The mark registered on the Principal Register. Open document brings up the full response as filed, with its exhibits.

Next, compare wins with losses. Select SUNBURST so the analysis includes it, clear Won by argument alone, and click Analyze Strategy. GleanMark reads about a dozen settled cases in full: the office action, the response, and the examiner's next letter. It sets the Registered filter aside, so it reads abandoned cases, too.

In about a minute, it summarizes what's important: what applicants argued, the evidence they filed, and what followed. Each point names its cases, grouped by how they ended.

Below, each case shows what the response argued, what it filed, and how it ended, with a link to the office action.

You now have a response that overcame this refusal for similar goods, and a summary of how similar responses fared. Review each case before relying on it.

Research how other applicants answered your next refusal. Start a free trial or book a short walkthrough at gleanmark.com.

See it on your own office actions

Start a free trial and research your next refusal, or book a short walkthrough.

Start a free trialBook a walkthrough

More feature videos

See all videos
2:14

Feature highlight

Office Action Page

2:35

Feature highlight

USPTO Research overview

2:46

Feature highlight

USPTO Research, tab by tab

1:48

Feature highlight

Thor Tech Pairs evidence

1:51

Feature highlight

Crowded Field evidence

1:54

Feature highlight

Disclaimer research

1:33

Feature highlight

Cited Marks research

2:00

Feature highlight

ID Manual wording search

1:42

Feature highlight

Fame Rulings research

2:12

Feature highlight

Office action exhibit builder

6:24

Platform demo

GleanMark platform tour

2:01

Feature highlight

Trademark Search overview

1:49

Feature highlight

Trademark Lookup

2:14

Feature highlight

The Trademark Page

1:49

Feature highlight

Knockout Search

2:30

Feature highlight

Clearance Report

2:06

Feature highlight

Knockout vs Clearance

1:58

Feature highlight

TESS-style trademark search

1:42

Feature highlight

Logo and Image Search

1:45

Feature highlight

TTAB case research

2:33

Feature highlight

Deadline Management

2:03

Feature highlight

Trademark Monitoring

1:46

Feature highlight

Watch Alerts

1:45

Feature highlight

Citation Alerts

1:55

Feature highlight

Auto-Built Portfolios

2:41

Feature highlight

Client Emails

1:25

Feature highlight

Firm Branding

1:00

Feature highlight

Matter Billing

2:12

Feature highlight

Lead Feed

1:57

Feature highlight

Plans and pricing

2:54

Feature highlight

Markus AI paralegal

1:37

Feature highlight

GleanMark in Claude and ChatGPT

GM
GleanMark

Trademark intelligence for prosecution attorneys.

Stay updated

For founders: glean.name ↗, a free trademark and domain check for startup names.

Product

  • Trademark Lookup
  • Clearance Reports
  • Office Action Lookup
  • Office Action Drafting
  • USPTO Research
  • TTAB Research
  • Watch Alerts
  • Automated Docketing
  • Markus AI™
  • All features
  • Pricing

Resources

  • Free Trademark Search
  • Office Action Decoder (free)
  • Insights
  • Feature videos
  • TTAB Desk
  • USPTO Guide
  • Precedents
  • State of Trademark Filings
  • Trademark Classes

Compare

  • GleanMark vs USPTO
  • GleanMark vs Corsearch
  • GleanMark vs TM TKO
  • GleanMark + Alt Legal
  • GleanMark vs LegalZoom
  • GleanMark vs Clarivate

Company

  • About Us
  • Press Kit
  • Contact
  • Partner Program
  • FAQ
  • Help Center

© 2026 TMZap Incorporated | All rights reserved.

256-bit SSL
SecurityStatusPrivacy PolicyTerms of ServiceCookie PolicySubprocessorsAffiliate Disclosure