Feature videos · USPTO Research
Feature highlight: Search Office Actions
Filter real office actions by refusal, outcome, class and the letters' text, read how each applicant responded, and let Analyze Strategy summarize what was argued, the evidence filed, and what followed.
Chapters
Find responses to the same refusal
Filter office actions by refusal type, outcome and class, search their full text, and keep the cases won by argument alone, with no consent and no change to the goods or the mark.
Read how the applicant answered
Hover over a response date for a summary of what the applicant argued, then open the full response as filed, with its exhibits.
A summary of what worked, and what did not
Analyze Strategy reads about a dozen settled cases in full, registered and abandoned, and summarizes what applicants argued, the evidence they filed, and what followed, each point naming its cases.
Transcript
Hi! This is Howard Katzenberg, GleanMark's founder. In this video, we'll walk you through GleanMark's Office Actions tab and Analyze Strategy. The Office Actions tab searches real office actions and the responses filed to them, so you can see how other office actions were responded to under similar circumstances.
Let's research a likelihood of confusion refusal for razors, where the examiner cited a registration for shampoo. Under Refusal Type, select 2(d) Confusion.
Under Outcome, select Registered. Then select class 8, which includes razors.
Switch the search box to Full Text, which searches the text of office actions and responses, and enter shampoo.
Then, under Response Analysis, select Won by argument alone. It keeps cases where the refusal was withdrawn after argument alone, with no consent and no change to the goods or the mark.
Take SUNBURST, for razors. The examiner refused it over the same name, registered for hair care products, and cited third-party registrations that cover both. Hover over the response date to see how the applicant argued. Identical marks with different owners already share the register, one for razors and one for hair care. The examiner relied on only five third-party registrations. And it pointed to eight third-party uses of SUNBURST for cosmetics.
The mark registered on the Principal Register. Open document brings up the full response as filed, with its exhibits.
Next, compare wins with losses. Select SUNBURST so the analysis includes it, clear Won by argument alone, and click Analyze Strategy. GleanMark reads about a dozen settled cases in full: the office action, the response, and the examiner's next letter. It sets the Registered filter aside, so it reads abandoned cases, too.
In about a minute, it summarizes what's important: what applicants argued, the evidence they filed, and what followed. Each point names its cases, grouped by how they ended.
Below, each case shows what the response argued, what it filed, and how it ended, with a link to the office action.
You now have a response that overcame this refusal for similar goods, and a summary of how similar responses fared. Review each case before relying on it.
Research how other applicants answered your next refusal. Start a free trial or book a short walkthrough at gleanmark.com.
See it on your own office actions
Start a free trial and research your next refusal, or book a short walkthrough.
More feature videos
See all videos
2:14Feature highlight
Office Action Page
2:35Feature highlight
USPTO Research overview
2:46Feature highlight
USPTO Research, tab by tab
1:48Feature highlight
Thor Tech Pairs evidence
1:51Feature highlight
Crowded Field evidence
1:54Feature highlight
Disclaimer research
1:33Feature highlight
Cited Marks research
2:00Feature highlight
ID Manual wording search
1:42Feature highlight
Fame Rulings research
2:12Feature highlight
Office action exhibit builder
6:24Platform demo
GleanMark platform tour
2:01Feature highlight
Trademark Search overview
1:49Feature highlight
Trademark Lookup
2:14Feature highlight
The Trademark Page
1:49Feature highlight
Knockout Search
2:30Feature highlight
Clearance Report
2:06Feature highlight
Knockout vs Clearance
1:58Feature highlight
TESS-style trademark search
1:42Feature highlight
Logo and Image Search
1:45Feature highlight
TTAB case research
2:33Feature highlight
Deadline Management
2:03Feature highlight
Trademark Monitoring
1:46Feature highlight
Watch Alerts
1:45Feature highlight
Citation Alerts
1:55Feature highlight
Auto-Built Portfolios
2:41Feature highlight
Client Emails
1:25Feature highlight
Firm Branding
1:00Feature highlight
Matter Billing
2:12Feature highlight
Lead Feed
1:57Feature highlight
Plans and pricing
2:54Feature highlight
Markus AI paralegal
1:37Feature highlight